ArticleScientific reports2024
CAD-PsorNet: deep transfer learning for computer-assisted diagnosis of skin psoriasis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2026Review
- AI in psoriatic disease ("PsAI"): Current insights and future directions.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psoriasis, being a chronic, inflammatory, lifelong skin disorder, has become a major threat to the human population. The precise and effective diagnosis of psoriasis continues to be difficult for clinicians due to its varied nature. In northern India, the prevalence of psoriasis among adult population ranges from 0.44 to 2.8%. Chronic plaque psoriasis accounts for over 90% of cases. This study utilized a dataset of 325 raw images collected from a reputable local hospital using a digital camera under uniform lighting conditions. These images were processed to generate 496 image patches (both diseased and normal), which were then normalized and resized for model training. An automated psoriasis image recognition framework was developed using four state-of-the-art deep transfer learning models: VGG16, VGG19, MobileNetV1, and ResNet-50. The convolutional layers adopted various edge, shape, and color filters to generate the feature map for psoriasis detection. Each pre-trained model was adapted with two dense layers, one dropout layer, and one output layer to classify input images. Among these models, MobileNetV1 achieved the best performance, with 94.84% sensitivity, 89.37% specificity, and 97.24% overall accuracy. Hyper-parameter tuning was performed using grid search to optimize learning rates, batch sizes, and dropout rates. The AdaGrad (Adaptive gradient)) optimizer was chosen for its adaptive learning rate capabilities, facilitating quicker convergence in model performance. Consequently, the methodology's performance improved to 94.25% sensitivity, 96.42% specificity, and 99.13% overall accuracy. The model's performance was also compared with non-machine learning-based diagnostic methods, yielding a Dice coefficient of 0.98. However, the model's effectiveness is dependent upon high-quality input images, as poor image conditions may affect accuracy, and it may not generalize well across diverse demographics or psoriasis variations, highlighting the need for varied training datasets for robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.