Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39489733›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Neural dissociation between computational and perceived measures of curvature.

Oshin Vartanian, Delaram Farzanfar, Enric Munar, Martin Skov, Gregor Hayn-Leichsenring, Pik Ki Ho, Dirk B Walther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oshin VartanianDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 4thFloor, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada. oshinv1@mac.com.
Delaram FarzanfarDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 4thFloor, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Enric MunarHuman Evolution and Cognition Group, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.
Martin SkovDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gregor Hayn-LeichsenringInstitute for Anatomy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Pik Ki HoHeriot-Watt University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Dirk B WaltherDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 4thFloor, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.

Funding

MICIU/AEI PID2022-137512NB-I00Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 435–2023-0015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence to suggest that preference for visual curvature is a reliable phenomenon. Yet, little is known about the ways in which the encoding of curvature in the brain contributes to hedonic evaluation while participants are actively engaged in making choices about objects varying in curvature. To address this question, we reanalyzed fMRI data collected while participants made aesthetic judgments (beautiful vs. not beautiful) and approach-avoidance decisions (enter vs. exit) in relation to measures of (a) computational curvature, (b) perceived curvature, (c) perceived angularity, and (d) aesthetic pleasure in the domain of architecture. Our results show that a region in early visual cortex (BA 17) encompassing largely areas V2-V3 is sensitive to variation in computational curvature across both beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions, whereas a region encompassing the fusiform gyrus (BA 37) exhibits sensitivity to perceived curvature only when participants made beauty judgments. These results contribute to our understanding of the neurobiological basis of curvature preference by demonstrating that the sensitivity of the visual cortex to computational curvature is context invariant, whereas the sensitivity of the fusiform gyrus to perceived curvature varies by context.

Indexed as

JudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingVisual CortexAdultBeautyBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAngularityArchitectureContourCurvatureDesignVision

Identifiers

PMID39489733
PMCPMC11532414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.