ArticleScientific reports2024
Novel large empirical study of deep transfer learning for COVID-19 classification based on CT and X-ray images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early and highly accurate prediction of COVID-19 based on medical images can speed up the diagnostic process and thereby mitigate disease spread; therefore, developing AI-based models is an inevitable endeavor. The presented work, to our knowledge, is the first to expand the model space and identify a better performing model among 10,000 constructed deep transfer learning (DTL) models as follows. First, we downloaded and processed 4481 CT and X-ray images pertaining to COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients, obtained from the Kaggle repository. Second, we provide processed images as inputs to four pre-trained deep learning models (ConvNeXt, EfficientNetV2, DenseNet121, and ResNet34) on more than a million images from the ImageNet database, in which we froze the convolutional and pooling layers pertaining to the feature extraction part while unfreezing and training the densely connected classifier with the Adam optimizer. Third, we generate and take a majority vote of two, three, and four combinations from the four DTL models, resulting in [Formula: see text] DTL models. Then, we combine the 11 DTL models, followed by consecutively generating and taking the majority vote of [Formula: see text] DTL models. Finally, we select [Formula: see text] DTL models from [Formula: see text] Experimental results from the whole datasets using five-fold cross-validation demonstrate that the best generated DTL model, named HC, achieving the best AUC of 0.909 when applied to the CT dataset, while ConvNeXt yielded a higher marginal AUC of 0.933 compared to 0.93 for HX when considering the X-ray dataset. These promising results set the foundation for promoting the large generation of models (LGM) in AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.