ArticleArthritis care & research2025
Transcriptional Profiling of Tofacitinib Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Implications for Treatment Response Prediction.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiplexed high-content imaging uncovers morphological diversity of lymphocyte activation and dysfunction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess changes in gene expression following tofacitinib treatment and investigate transcription patterns as potential predictors of treatment response in patients with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
methodsWhole-blood samples were collected from patients with JIA at baseline and after 18 weeks of open-label tofacitinib treatment. Patients who achieved a JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response of 70% or above at week 18 were classified as treatment responders (TRs), whereas those with at most a JIA-ACR30 were classified as poor responders (PRs). Differential gene expression and gene ontology overrepresentation analyses were performed to compare RNA expression between week 18 and baseline samples, as well as between PR and TR samples at baseline.
resultsSamples from 67 patients at baseline and 60 patients at week 18 were analyzed. After 18 weeks of tofacitinib treatment across all patients with JIA, 883 genes showed significant differential expression (week 18 to baseline). The most strongly down-regulated genes were overrepresented within interleukin-7 (IL-7) and type I and type II interferon pathways, whereas up-regulated genes were enriched in ontologies related to neuronal cell processes and cell signaling. Comparing PRs and TRs at baseline, 663 genes showed differential expression. Up-regulated genes were overrepresented within ontologies including activation of MAPK activity (P = 9.40 × 10
conclusionTofacitinib treatment in JIA down-regulated genes in interferon and IL-7 signaling pathways regardless of effectiveness. Furthermore, baseline up-regulation of MAPK signaling may predict poor response to tofacitinib treatment in JIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.