Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39489496›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

How, Why and When: Nursing Staff's Experiences of Working With Suicide Risk Assessment Instruments.

Rikard Wärdig, Isabella Wallerstedt, Anna Mattison Nyström, Sally Hultsjö

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rikard WärdigDivision of Nursing and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-3723
Isabella WallerstedtDivision of Nursing and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna Mattison NyströmDivision of Nursing and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sally HultsjöDivision of Nursing and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård, Region Jönköpings läns
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo describe psychiatric nursing staff´s experiences of working with suicide risk assessment instruments.

backgroundAround the world, approximately 720,000 people die by suicide each year, of which almost 20% have an ongoing contact with specialist psychiatry during their last month alive. To identify which patients have an increased risk of suicide is a highly important task for nursing staff. Suicidal behaviour is complex and unpredictable. Nursing staff work closely with patients in everyday psychiatric care and often possess unique patient knowledge. These professionals must therefore be able to know when a patient's eventual suicidality requires further attention and efforts.

designA descriptive qualitative study.

methodsConvenience sampling including nursing staff with more than 2 years of experience in specialist psychiatry. The data collection took place through semi-structured interviews and was then analysed according to conventional content analysis.

resultsThe nursing staff felt that a natural conversation is superior suicide risk assessment instruments and that experience and patient knowledge are the primary factors for facilitating a suicide risk assessment. This meant that some nursing staff rarely used suicide risk assessment instruments, although they sometimes could be a useful support in the conversation and provided a sense of personal security when documenting results.

conclusionSuicide risk assessment instrument can be significant and helpful in certain cases, but the essential components of a suicide risk assessment consist of a conversation to understand the meaning of suicide from the patient's perspective. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Psychiatric nursing staff contributed to this study by sharing their experiences through interviews.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing StaffPsychiatric NursingRisk AssessmentSuicideSuicide Preventionintuitionnursequalitative methodsuicide preventionsuicide risk assessment instruments

Identifiers

PMID39489496
PMCPMC11531860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.