Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39489494›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2026

Impact of genetic risk information for cardiovascular disease on behavioural changes, psychological responses and risk factor modification: a systematic review.

Ruofei Trophy Chen, Vincent Pearson, Orathai Suebkinorn, Lemma N Bulto, Mihirika Pincha Baduge, Alice Anderson, Adam J Nelson, Sophia Zoungas, Robyn A Clark, Stephen J Nicholls

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic risk disclosure and behavioural change: not so fast.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruofei Trophy ChenMonash Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Level 2, 631 Blackburn Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1026-9922
Vincent PearsonJBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
Orathai SuebkinornCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Lemma N BultoCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9528-5595
Mihirika Pincha BadugeMonash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, Monash University, Level 1, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Alice AndersonMonash Health Library, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Adam J NelsonMonash Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Level 2, 631 Blackburn Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Sophia ZoungasSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Robyn A ClarkCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5063-2618
Stephen J NichollsMonash Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Level 2, 631 Blackburn Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a significant public health concern, influenced by both genetic susceptibility and lifestyle factors. Integrating genetic risk information into clinical practice shows promise but has yielded mixed results regarding its impact on CVD prevention and management. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of providing genetic CVD risk information on health behaviours, psychological outcomes, and risk factors. METHODS AND

resultsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, four electronic databases and two trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of genetic risk information on the CVD risk profile. Data were synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach. Of the 3596 articles retrieved, 11 studies were eligible. Genetic risk information showed modest improvements in dietary behaviour but had inconclusive effects on physical activity and medication adherence. Minimal changes in psychological outcomes were noted, including a slight decrease in depression. The impact on traditional risk factors, such as systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol, was also limited. Bias across all studies was noted.

conclusionGenetic CVD risk information has limited effects on clinical outcomes and psychological factors, despite its potential to encourage some health behaviour changes. These findings suggest that genetic risk information alone may not be sufficient to significantly reduce cardiovascular risk, highlighting the need for further research to better understand its long-term effects.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRisk Reduction BehaviorHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBehavioural changesPolygenic riskRisk communicationRisk factor modification

Identifiers

PMID39489494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.