Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39489479›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology2025

Clinician Perspectives on Adolescent Contraceptive Counseling Following Dobbs v. Jackson: Implications for Young People's Contraceptive Autonomy.

Brooke W Bullington, Emily S Mann, Madeline Thornton, Joline Hartheimer, Kavita Shah Arora, Bianca A Allison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brooke W BullingtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: bbullington@unc.edu.
Emily S MannCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Department of Women's and Gender Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Madeline ThorntonSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Joline HartheimerSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kavita Shah AroraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Bianca A AllisonDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
CTSA K12 Program at UNCK12TR004416 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michelle Hernandez, Jonathan J Juliano · 2023 to 2026
$6.5M
Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004416NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to understand whether clinicians who provide contraceptive counseling to adolescent patients perceive that the Dobbs decision has influenced their counseling. STUDY

designWe conducted in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of 16 clinicians who provide contraceptive counseling to adolescents at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual conference in October 2022. We used thematic content analysis and an iterative process of constant comparison to identify themes inductively. This analysis focused on participants' perception of if and how the Dobbs decision has or will influence their contraceptive counseling with adolescents.

resultsMost clinicians in our study reported that the Dobbs decision influenced their contraceptive counseling. This included promoting long-acting reversible methods more so than pre-Dobbs, and explicitly considering changing state-level abortion laws and restrictions. Many clinicians openly noted that their personal preferences influence their counseling, such as prioritizing pregnancy prevention and encouraging patients to use particular methods.

conclusionWe found that most clinicians in our sample acknowledged that the Dobbs decision has influenced their contraceptive counseling practices with adolescents. Clinicians' responses demonstrate that, in many instances, the Dobbs decision motivated them to focus on method effectiveness, leading to tiered and directive contraceptive counseling. We recommend practice changes to support comprehensive contraceptive care provision, provider trainings in unbiased counseling, and developmentally tailored decision aids are needed to ensure that adolescent patients' autonomy is prioritized over a singular focus on pregnancy prevention.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelContraceptionCounselingFamily Planning ServicesPregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePersonal AutonomyPregnancyQualitative ResearchAbortionAdolescentsContraceptive counselingDobbsReproductive health

Identifiers

PMID39489479
PMCPMC11769761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.