Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488823›Full record

Observational studyDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2025

Exploring the communication access and participation of a young adult with autism spectrum disorder with limited speech and inpatient nursing staff.

Jessica Gormley, Savanna Brittlebank, Janice Light

Abstract readObservational StudyCase Reports
In one paragraph

Observational study in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica GormleySpeech-Language Pathology Department, Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-8421
Savanna BrittlebankDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2524-9852
Janice LightThe Hintz Family Endowed Chair in Children's Communicative Competence, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90RE5017ACL HHS 90REGE0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the nature of interactions between health care professionals and a young adult with autism spectrum disorder with limited speech during an inpatient stay. An observational study was conducted to describe the interactions between a young adult on the autism spectrum and 14 of his inpatient health care providers. Naturalistic video-recordings were taken, and behavioral coding was completed to measure the frequency and type of communication turns taken. The providers took 93% of conversational turns. Most provider turns (76%) were non-obligatory in nature and did not invite the young adult to engage in turn-taking. The young adult only had access to his communication system during one of the 27 interactions (4%); however, when he had access to his system, he demonstrated higher levels of turn-taking. Health care providers should offer patients with limited speech more communicative turns, provide adequate wait time, and ensure communication systems are available during all inpatient interactions.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderCommunicationCommunication BarriersCommunication Devices for People with DisabilitiesProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultHumansInpatientsMaleVideo RecordingYoung AdultAugmentative and alternative communication systemsautismcommunicationinpatient

Identifiers

PMID39488823
PMCPMC12057628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.