Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488649›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Dynamical mechanisms of how an RNN keeps a beat, uncovered with a low-dimensional reduced model.

Klavdia Zemlianova, Amitabha Bose, John Rinzel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Finding the groove in neural space.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Musical neurodynamics.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klavdia ZemlianovaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Amitabha BoseDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
John RinzelCenter for Neural Science and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. rinzeljm@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite music's omnipresence, the specific neural mechanisms responsible for perceiving and anticipating temporal patterns in music are unknown. To study potential mechanisms for keeping time in rhythmic contexts, we train a biologically constrained RNN, with excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) units, on seven different stimulus tempos (2-8 Hz) on a synchronization and continuation task, a standard experimental paradigm. Our trained RNN generates a network oscillator that uses an input current (context parameter) to control oscillation frequency and replicates key features of neural dynamics observed in neural recordings of monkeys performing the same task. We develop a reduced three-variable rate model of the RNN and analyze its dynamic properties. By treating our understanding of the mathematical structure for oscillations in the reduced model as predictive, we confirm that the dynamical mechanisms are found also in the RNN. Our neurally plausible reduced model reveals an E-I circuit with two distinct inhibitory sub-populations, of which one is tightly synchronized with the excitatory units.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAuditory PerceptionMusicNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID39488649
PMCPMC11531529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.