ArticleScientific reports2024
AI derived ECG global longitudinal strain compared to echocardiographic measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk Stratification of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction Using AI-Enhanced Electrocardiography
Evaluation of Cardioprotective Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter CDM-Based Retrospective Cohort Study With Prospective AI-ECG Validation
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of AI-enhanced ECG image analysis for identifying extreme cardiac magnetic resonance metrics in a cross-ethnic UK biobank study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evolving role of echocardiography across the heart failure spectrum: from prevention to advanced management.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Use of artificial intelligence for detecting left ventricular dysfunction and predicting incident heart failure risk.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Cardiac Function.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- AI Tools for Heart Failure Management: A Comprehensive Review of Potential, Pitfalls, and Predictive Analytics.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) is versatile; however, it is difficult to obtain. We evaluated the potential of an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated electrocardiography score for LVGLS estimation (ECG-GLS score) to diagnose LV systolic dysfunction and predict prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). A convolutional neural network-based deep-learning algorithm was trained to estimate the echocardiography-derived GLS (LVGLS). ECG-GLS score performance was evaluated using data from an acute HF registry at another tertiary hospital (n = 1186). In the validation cohort, the ECG-GLS score could identify patients with impaired LVGLS (≤ 12%) (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.82; sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 59%). The performance of ECG-GLS in identifying patients with an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (AUROC, 0.85) was comparable to that of LVGLS (AUROC, 0.83) (p = 0.08). Five-year outcomes (all-cause death; composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF) occurred significantly more frequently in patients with low ECG-GLS scores. Low ECG-GLS score was a significant risk factor for these outcomes after adjustment for other clinical risk factors and LVEF. The ECG-GLS score demonstrated a meaningful correlation with the LVGLS and is effective in risk stratification for long-term prognosis after acute HF, possibly acting as a practical alternative to the LVGLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.