ArticleScientific reports2024
Screening and validating the optimal panel of housekeeping genes for 4T1 breast carcinoma and metastasis studies in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Cholestatic Liver Disease Induced by Larval Ascariasis: Novel Insights Into Immune-Mediated Pathogenesis and Hepatic Fibrosis in Mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Enhanced anticancer efficacy of α-lipoic acid-loaded TPGS micelles: Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation in a 4T1 breast cancer model.BioImpacts : BI · 2026Article
- New mouse model based on adenocarcinoma 4T1 cells expressing HPV16 E6 and E7 applied to assess the efficacy of therapeutic and prophylactic E6/E7-based HPV16 vaccines.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 4T1 model is extensively employed in murine studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the carcinogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer. Molecular biology serves as a cornerstone in these investigations. However, accurate gene expression analyses necessitate data normalization employing housekeeping genes (HKGs) to avert spurious results. Here, we initially delve into the characteristics of the tumor evolution induced by 4T1 in mice, underscoring the imperative for additional tools for tumor monitoring and assessment methods for tracking the animals, thereby facilitating prospective studies employing this methodology. Subsequently, leveraging various software platforms, we assessed ten distinct HKGs (GAPDH, 18 S, ACTB, HPRT1, B2M, GUSB, PGK1, CCSER2, SYMPK, ANKRD17) not hitherto evaluated in the 4T1 breast cancer model, across tumors and diverse tissues afflicted by metastasis. Our principal findings underscore GAPDH as the optimal HKG for gene expression analyses in tumors, while HPRT1 emerged as the most stable in the liver and CCSER2 in the lung. These genes demonstrated consistent expression and minimal variation among experimental groups. Furthermore, employing these HKGs for normalization, we assessed TNF-α and VEGF expression in tissues and discerned significant disparities among groups. We posit that this constitutes the inaugural delineation of an ideal HKG for experiments utilizing the 4T1 model, particularly in vivo settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.