Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488625›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Screening and validating the optimal panel of housekeeping genes for 4T1 breast carcinoma and metastasis studies in mice.

Jorge Lucas Nascimento Souza, Ana Rafaela Antunes-Porto, Izabela da Silva Oliveira, Chiara Cássia Oliveira Amorim, Luiz Octávio Pires, Isabela de Brito Duval, Luisa Vitor Braga do Amaral, Fernanda Rezende Souza, Evelyn Ane Oliveira, Geovanni Dantas Cassali and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chronic Cholestatic Liver Disease Induced by Larval Ascariasis: Novel Insights Into Immune-Mediated Pathogenesis and Hepatic Fibrosis in Mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jorge Lucas Nascimento SouzaLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ana Rafaela Antunes-PortoLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Izabela da Silva OliveiraLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Chiara Cássia Oliveira AmorimLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luiz Octávio PiresLaboratory of Radioisotopes, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Isabela de Brito DuvalLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Luisa Vitor Braga do AmaralLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fernanda Rezende SouzaLaboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Genetal Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Evelyn Ane OliveiraLaboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Genetal Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Geovanni Dantas CassaliLaboratory of Comparative Pathology, Department of Genetal Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Valbert Nascimento CardosoLaboratory of Radioisotopes, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Simone Odília Antunes FernandesLaboratory of Radioisotopes, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Remo Castro RussoLaboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Mechanics, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lilian Lacerda BuenoLaboratory of Immunobiology and Control of Parasites, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. lilacerdabueno@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 4T1 model is extensively employed in murine studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the carcinogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer. Molecular biology serves as a cornerstone in these investigations. However, accurate gene expression analyses necessitate data normalization employing housekeeping genes (HKGs) to avert spurious results. Here, we initially delve into the characteristics of the tumor evolution induced by 4T1 in mice, underscoring the imperative for additional tools for tumor monitoring and assessment methods for tracking the animals, thereby facilitating prospective studies employing this methodology. Subsequently, leveraging various software platforms, we assessed ten distinct HKGs (GAPDH, 18 S, ACTB, HPRT1, B2M, GUSB, PGK1, CCSER2, SYMPK, ANKRD17) not hitherto evaluated in the 4T1 breast cancer model, across tumors and diverse tissues afflicted by metastasis. Our principal findings underscore GAPDH as the optimal HKG for gene expression analyses in tumors, while HPRT1 emerged as the most stable in the liver and CCSER2 in the lung. These genes demonstrated consistent expression and minimal variation among experimental groups. Furthermore, employing these HKGs for normalization, we assessed TNF-α and VEGF expression in tissues and discerned significant disparities among groups. We posit that this constitutes the inaugural delineation of an ideal HKG for experiments utilizing the 4T1 model, particularly in vivo settings.

Indexed as

Genes, EssentialAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasm MetastasisVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AExperimental metastasisGene expressionHousekeeping genesRadioisotopesRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID39488625
PMCPMC11531515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.