ArticleScientific reports2024
Electrochemical study of an enhanced platform by electrochemical synthesis of three-dimensional polyaniline nanofibers/reduced graphene oxide thin films for diverse applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering graphene oxide interfaces for electrochemical biosensing of biomolecules, cells, and organoids.Nano convergence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work reports the electrochemical fabrication of thin films comprising polyaniline nanofibers (PANI) in conjunction with graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) on ITO substrate, along with examining the electrochemical properties, with a focus on the influence of the substrate and electrolyte in the electrodeposition methods. The study explores the electrochemical characteristics of these thin films and establishes a flexible framework for their application in diverse sectors such as sensors, supercapacitors, and electronic devices. It analyzes the impact of the substrate and electrolyte in electrodeposition techniques. The effects were studied using techniques such as cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. The fabrication process of PANI/GO and PANI/rGO thin films involved the integration of rGO within PANI via electropolymerization, conducted under sulfuric acid. GO was synthesized by modifying the well-known Hummers' method and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). SEM showed the diameters of the formed PANI were between 40 and 150 nm, which helped to intertwine the rGO nanosheets with PANI nanofibers to form thin films. The electrochemical behavior of the PANI/rGO thin films was examined using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry in different electrolytes, including sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) and potassium nitrate (KNO₃). The CV profiles exhibited distinct oxidation and reduction peaks, with variations in the voltammogram morphology attributed to the nature of the electrolyte and the substrate employed during the electrodeposition process. These results highlight the critical role of both the substrate and electrolyte in governing the electrochemical performance of PANI/rGO thin films. The findings from this study demonstrate a versatile approach for the fabrication of PANI/graphene-based thin films with tunable electrochemical properties, and such a strategy has great application to fabricating other thin film composites for supercapacitors or other control source frameworks requiring enhanced charge storage and electrochemical responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.