Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488523›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

A benchmark for domain adaptation and generalization in smartphone-based human activity recognition.

Otávio Napoli, Dami Duarte, Patrick Alves, Darlinne Hubert Palo Soto, Henrique Evangelista de Oliveira, Anderson Rocha, Levy Boccato, Edson Borin

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Otávio Napoli *Institute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil. otavio.napoli@ic.unicamp.br.
Dami Duarte *School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Unicamp, Brazil.
Patrick Alves *Institute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil.
Darlinne Hubert Palo SotoInstitute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil.
Henrique Evangelista de OliveiraInstitute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil.
Anderson RochaInstitute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil.
Levy BoccatoSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Unicamp, Brazil.
Edson BorinInstitute of Computing, Unicamp, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation) 2013/08293-7Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation) 01245.003479/2024-10Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 315399/2023-6Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) 404087/2021-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) using smartphone inertial sensors, like accelerometers and gyroscopes, enhances smartphones' adaptability and user experience. Data distribution from these sensors is affected by several factors including sensor hardware, software, device placement, user demographics, terrain, and more. Most datasets focus on providing variability in user and (sometimes) device placement, limiting domain adaptation and generalization studies. Consequently, models trained on one dataset often perform poorly on others. Despite many publicly available HAR datasets, cross-dataset generalization remains challenging due to data format incompatibilities, such as differences in measurement units, sampling rates, and label encoding. Hence, we introduce the DAGHAR benchmark, a curated collection of datasets for domain adaptation and generalization studies in smartphone-based HAR. We standardized six datasets in terms of accelerometer units, sampling rate, gravity component, activity labels, user partitioning, and time window size, removing trivial biases while preserving intrinsic differences. This enables controlled evaluation of model generalization capabilities. Additionally, we provide baseline performance metrics from state-of-the-art machine learning models, crucial for comprehensive evaluations of generalization in HAR tasks.

Indexed as

AccelerometryHuman ActivitiesSmartphoneBenchmarkingHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39488523
PMCPMC11531562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.