ArticleScientific data2024
A benchmark for domain adaptation and generalization in smartphone-based human activity recognition.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon based functional materials enable multifunctional flexible strain sensors for wearable and implantable applications.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Wearable Multifunctional Sensors for Human Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- PDSXray: A Benchmark Dataset for Pseudocoloring-Driven Domain Adaptation in Security X-ray Inspection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Associations of Normalization and Regularization with Machine Learning Overfitting in Cross-dataset Classification of Deaths Using Transcriptomic and Clinical Data: A Secondary Analysis of Publicly Available Databases.Journal of clinical and translational pathology · 2026Article
- A Feature-Augmented Transformer Model to Recognize Functional Activities From in-the-Wild Smartwatch Data.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) using smartphone inertial sensors, like accelerometers and gyroscopes, enhances smartphones' adaptability and user experience. Data distribution from these sensors is affected by several factors including sensor hardware, software, device placement, user demographics, terrain, and more. Most datasets focus on providing variability in user and (sometimes) device placement, limiting domain adaptation and generalization studies. Consequently, models trained on one dataset often perform poorly on others. Despite many publicly available HAR datasets, cross-dataset generalization remains challenging due to data format incompatibilities, such as differences in measurement units, sampling rates, and label encoding. Hence, we introduce the DAGHAR benchmark, a curated collection of datasets for domain adaptation and generalization studies in smartphone-based HAR. We standardized six datasets in terms of accelerometer units, sampling rate, gravity component, activity labels, user partitioning, and time window size, removing trivial biases while preserving intrinsic differences. This enables controlled evaluation of model generalization capabilities. Additionally, we provide baseline performance metrics from state-of-the-art machine learning models, crucial for comprehensive evaluations of generalization in HAR tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.