Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488521›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 XBB vaccine in the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Aisling R Caffrey, Haley J Appaneal, Vrishali V Lopes, Laura Puzniak, Evan J Zasowski, Luis Jodar, Kerry L LaPlante, John M McLaughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aisling R CaffreyInfectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA. Aisling_Caffrey@uri.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4180-027X
Haley J AppanealInfectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA.
Vrishali V LopesInfectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA.
Laura PuzniakPfizer Inc. New York, New York, USA.
Evan J ZasowskiPfizer Inc. New York, New York, USA.
Luis JodarPfizer Inc. New York, New York, USA.
Kerry L LaPlanteInfectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA.
John M McLaughlinPfizer Inc. New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data evaluating effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines against JN.1-related endpoints are scarce. This nationwide test-negative case-control study within the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System aims to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine compared to not receiving an XBB vaccine of any kind against COVID-19 hospitalization, emergency department or urgent care visits (ED/UC), and outpatient visits. Between September 25, 2023 and January 31, 2024, effectiveness was 24-35% during a period of JN.1 predominance and 50-61% during XBB predominance across all outcomes. VE within 60 days of vaccination during the likely JN.1 period was 32% (95% confidence interval 3-52%) against hospitalization, 41% (23-54%) against ED/UC visits, and 31% (1-52%) against outpatient visits. Corresponding VE during the likely XBB period was 62% (44-74%), 52% (37-63%), and 50% (25-66%) by setting, respectively. Here, we show the importance of strain match to maximize the public health impact of COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2United States Department of Veterans AffairsVaccine EfficacyAdultAgedAmbulatory CareCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39488521
PMCPMC11531596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.