Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of iPSC-derived human intestinal epithelial cells with Caco-2 cells and human in vivo data after exposure to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WCFS1.

Aafke W F Janssen, Benthe van der Lugt, Loes P M Duivenvoorde, Arjan Paul Vos, Shanna Bastiaan-Net, Monic M M Tomassen, Janine A C Verbokkem, Emmie Blok-Heimerikx, Guido J E J Hooiveld, Peter van Baarlen and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aafke W F Janssen *Wageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Benthe van der Lugt *Wageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Loes P M DuivenvoordeWageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Arjan Paul VosWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Shanna Bastiaan-NetWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Monic M M TomassenWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Janine A C VerbokkemWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Emmie Blok-HeimerikxWageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Guido J E J HooiveldNutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter van BaarlenHost-Microbe Interactomics, Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Laurent FerrierNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Meike van der ZandeWageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. meike.vanderzande@wur.nl.

Funding

Dutch ministries of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and Economic affairs KB37-001-003Top consortium for Knowledge and Innovation (TKI) Agri & Food LWV19125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate intestinal health and its potential disruptors in vitro, representative models are required. Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) more closely resemble the in vivo intestinal tissue than conventional in vitro models like human colonic adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells. However, the potential of IECs to study immune-related responses upon external stimuli has not been investigated in detail yet. The aim of the current study was to evaluate immune-related effects of IECs by challenging them with a pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktail. Subsequently, the effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WCFS1 were investigated in unchallenged and challenged IECs. All exposures were compared to Caco-2 cells and in vivo data where possible. Upon the inflammatory challenge, IECs and Caco-2 cells induced a pro-inflammatory response which was strongest in IECs. Heat-killed L. plantarum exerted the strongest effect on immune parameters in the IEC model, while L. plantarum in the stationary growth phase had most pronounced effects on immune-related gene expression in Caco-2 cells. Unfortunately, comparison to in vivo transcriptomics data showed limited similarities, which could be explained by essential differences in the study setups. Altogether, hiPSC-derived IECs show a high potential as a model to study immune-related responses in the intestinal epithelium in vitro.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsIntestinal MucosaCaco-2 CellsCytokinesEpithelial CellsHumansLactiplantibacillus plantarumCytokines

Identifiers

PMID39488516
PMCPMC11531526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.