Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488431›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effects of phrenic nerve magnetic stimulation on respiratory function in stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Xiaoli Xu, Qiong Han, Zhipeng Yan, Jun Ni, Zhiyong Wang

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoli XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian, Fuzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6896-4988
Qiong HanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zhipeng YanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jun NiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zhiyong WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Fuzhou First Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China fjykdxwzy@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespiratory dysfunction is a notable complication in stroke patients, in which the diaphragm, as the primary respiratory muscle, directly influences lung function. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a new, non-invasive approach that is used to treat brain and nerve problems. Few studies have examined the effect of magnetic stimulation on the phrenic nerve, breathing and diaphragm in stroke patients. This study aims to assess the effect of magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation on respiratory muscle function and lung function in adults with stroke. The results of this study may provide a promising approach to managing respiratory dysfunction in stroke patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is designed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rPMS) and conventional rehabilitation training in enhancing respiratory muscle strength, lung function indicators, diaphragmatic excursion and diaphragm thickness in patients with respiratory muscle weakness. Thirty patients admitted to the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University will be included in this study. Participants in the intervention group will undergo daily bilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation for 2 weeks. Stimulation will be administered at a frequency of 25 Hz, with a pulse duration of 1.1 s and an inter-pulse interval of 5.9 s, for 5 days each week. Primary outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after 2 weeks (end of the intervention) to evaluate the efficacy of rPMS compared with conventional rehabilitation techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Before commencing the study, all participants will receive a comprehensive explanation of the study procedures, including the assessments. They will also be provided informed consent forms for review, completion and signing. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No.: MRCTA, ECFAH of FMU [2021]641, dated 10 November 2023) (Appendix Ⅰ & Ⅱ). The trial protocol will strictly adhere to the Uniform Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. The trial has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.Dissemination of individual findings for each participant will be available at the end of the study. The findings will be disseminated to different interest groups, participants or other patients with respiratory dysfunction through journal papers and/or conference presentations. The results of the primary trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2300075669, registered on 12 September 2023.

Indexed as

Magnetic Field TherapyPhrenic NerveStroke RehabilitationAdultDiaphragmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory MusclesStrokeClinical TrialRandomized Controlled TrialRespiratory TherapyStroke Medicine

Identifiers

PMID39488431
PMCPMC11667328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.