ArticleBMJ open2024
Effects of phrenic nerve magnetic stimulation on respiratory function in stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRespiratory dysfunction is a notable complication in stroke patients, in which the diaphragm, as the primary respiratory muscle, directly influences lung function. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is a new, non-invasive approach that is used to treat brain and nerve problems. Few studies have examined the effect of magnetic stimulation on the phrenic nerve, breathing and diaphragm in stroke patients. This study aims to assess the effect of magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation on respiratory muscle function and lung function in adults with stroke. The results of this study may provide a promising approach to managing respiratory dysfunction in stroke patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is designed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (rPMS) and conventional rehabilitation training in enhancing respiratory muscle strength, lung function indicators, diaphragmatic excursion and diaphragm thickness in patients with respiratory muscle weakness. Thirty patients admitted to the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University will be included in this study. Participants in the intervention group will undergo daily bilateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation for 2 weeks. Stimulation will be administered at a frequency of 25 Hz, with a pulse duration of 1.1 s and an inter-pulse interval of 5.9 s, for 5 days each week. Primary outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and after 2 weeks (end of the intervention) to evaluate the efficacy of rPMS compared with conventional rehabilitation techniques. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Before commencing the study, all participants will receive a comprehensive explanation of the study procedures, including the assessments. They will also be provided informed consent forms for review, completion and signing. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No.: MRCTA, ECFAH of FMU [2021]641, dated 10 November 2023) (Appendix Ⅰ & Ⅱ). The trial protocol will strictly adhere to the Uniform Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. The trial has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.Dissemination of individual findings for each participant will be available at the end of the study. The findings will be disseminated to different interest groups, participants or other patients with respiratory dysfunction through journal papers and/or conference presentations. The results of the primary trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2300075669, registered on 12 September 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.