Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488339›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurointerventional surgery2025

Non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosing pulsatile tinnitus: a comprehensive review and recommended imaging algorithm.

Madhavi Duvvuri, Haider Ali, Matthew Robert Amans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madhavi DuvvuriRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Haider AliRadiology and Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Matthew Robert AmansRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA matthew.amans@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-0534

Funding

Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
MR Imaging of Blood Flow in Pulsatile TinnitusR21DC016087 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AMANS, MATTHEW, SALONER, DAVID A · 2017 to 2018
$436k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is a challenging diagnostic condition arising from various vascular, neoplastic, and systemic disorders. Non-invasive imaging is essential for identifying underlying causes while minimizing risks of invasive diagnostic angiography. Although no consensus exists on the primary imaging modality for PT and currently CT, ultrasound, and MRI are used in the diagnostic pathway, MRI is increasingly preferred as the first-line screening test for its diagnostic efficacy and safety. MRI protocols such as time-of-flight, magnetic resonance angiography, diffusion-weighted imaging, and arterial spin labeling can identify serious causes, including vascular shunting lesions, venous sinus stenosis, and tumors. In this narrative review of the current literature we discuss the benefits and limitations of various non-invasive imaging modalities in identifying the characteristic imaging findings of the most common causes of PT and also provide an algorithm that clinicians can use to guide the imaging evaluation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTinnitusHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAngiographyCTMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMRITumor

Identifiers

PMID39488339
PMCPMC12290034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.