Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487998›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2026

Women in space: A review of known physiological adaptations and health perspectives.

Millie Hughes-Fulford, Danielle J Carroll, Heather C M Allaway, Bonnie J Dunbar, Aenor J Sawyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Millie Hughes-Fulford *UC Space Health, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-068X
Danielle J CarrollUC Space Health, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-2994
Heather C M AllawayDepartment of Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2023-9337
Bonnie J DunbarDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-1434
Aenor J SawyerUC Space Health, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-5743

Funding

Translational Research Institute for Space Health NNX16AO69A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to the spaceflight environment causes adaptations in most human physiological systems, many of which are thought to affect women differently from men. Since only 11.5% of astronauts worldwide have been female, these issues are largely understudied. The physiological nuances affecting the female body in the spaceflight environment remain inadequately defined since the last thorough published review on the subject. A PubMed literature search yielded over 2200 publications. Using NASA's 2014 review series 'The effects of sex and gender on adaptation to space' as a benchmark, we identified substantive advancements and persistent knowledge gaps in need of further study from the nearly 600 related articles that have been published since the initial review. This review highlights the most critical issues to mitigate medical risk and promote the success of missions to the Moon and Mars. Salient sex-linked differences observed terrestrially should be studied during upcoming missions, including increased levels of inflammatory markers, coagulation factors and leptin levels following sleep deprivation; correlation between body mass and the severity of spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome; increased incidence of orthostatic intolerance; increased severity of muscle atrophy and bone loss; differences in the incidence of urinary tract infections; and susceptibility to specific cancers after exposure to ionizing radiation. To optimize health and well-being among all astronauts, it is imperative to prioritize research that considers the physiological nuances of the female body. A more robust understanding of female physiology in the spaceflight environment will support crew readiness for Artemis missions and beyond.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalSpace FlightAstronautsFemaleHumansWeightlessnessexplorationgendermicrogravityphysiologywomen

Identifiers

PMID39487998
PMCPMC13395041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.