ArticleDermatology and therapy2024
Equity and Outcome Events in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Exploring Effect Modifiers Associated with Diagnostic Delay in the Real World.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioeconomic factors and time to diagnosis in hidradenitis suppurativa.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience significantly delayed diagnoses of 7-10 years from symptom onset on average, but the reasons for this remain largely unknown. This study investigated drivers of diagnostic delay from the perspective of healthcare system equity.
methodsA literature review was performed to identify published factors associated with delayed HS diagnosis to inform data analysis. Clinical and demographic data from the Adelphi HS Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and their consulting patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA in 2020/2021, were used to model factors influencing delay to diagnosis from onset of symptoms and first consultation.
resultsFactors influencing delay to HS diagnosis in the literature with the most available evidence were misdiagnosis, delay in specialist referral and patient embarrassment. Data analysis revealed that increasing age was associated with reduced diagnostic delay after symptom onset. Patients with HS who were White or in Germany were also more likely to receive a faster diagnosis. Smokers, patients with concomitant conditions, or a family history of HS were slower to be diagnosed. When time to diagnosis following first consultation was assessed, increasing age was associated with quicker diagnosis. Moreover, patients with a family history of HS were diagnosed quicker, whereas those with high body mass index, more concomitant conditions, in employment, managed by multiple physicians or European were more delayed.
conclusionOn the basis of a thorough analysis of real-world data, multiple factors that potentially influenced the timely diagnosis of HS have been identified. For the first time, this study quantifies the relative impact of these modifiers, providing valuable insights into areas that require attention for faster diagnoses and improved disease outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.