Promoting application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols during perioperative localized abdominal and thoracic neuroblastomas.

aimTo investigate the safety and efficacy of the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in the perioperative period of abdominal and thoracic localized neuroblastomas (NBs).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 68 children with NBs who underwent surgical resection of the tumor were enrolled. The ERAS protocols for NB excision were implemented in the ERAS group (n = 39) and the consequences were compared with children treated with traditional care (n = 29, TRAD group). The main outcomes of our interest included the incidence of surgery-related complications, the postoperative length of stay (LOS), and the Face/Legs/Activity/Cry/Consolability (FLACC) quantitative table from postoperative days (POD) 1-5. We also evaluated the median intraoperative fluid volume and anesthesia recovery time; blood glucose levels at the beginning of anesthesia, POD1, and 3; WBC counts, CRP values, and the concentration of plasma nutritional indicators on POD1 and 3; time of early ambulation, first anal exhaust, total enteral nutrition (TEN), and discontinue intravenous infusion postoperatively; usage proportion and duration of abdominal and thoracic drainages, nasogastric decompression tubes and urinary catheters; cost of hospitalization, parental satisfaction rate, and readmission rate of surgery ward within 30 days.

resultsCompared to the TRAD group, the ERAS group had lower surgery-related complications, albeit not significantly (P > 0.05); the median postoperative LOS decreased from 11.0 to 8.0 days (P < 0.001), the LOS of abdominal NB was significantly shortened (P < 0.001) compared to thoracic NB (P = 0.07) between the two groups; the FLACC scores decreased significantly from POD1-5 (all P < 0.01). The ERAS group had an improved median intraoperative infusion speed (5.0 mL/kg/h vs 8.0 mL/kg/h), time of early ambulation (1.0 days vs 3.0 days), first anal exhaust (2.0 days vs 2.0 days), TEN (5.0 vs 7.0 days), discontinuation of intravenous infusion (5.0 days vs 8.0 days), and total cost of hospitalization (33,897.2 Yuan vs 38,876.3 Yuan); (all P < 0.01). The usage proportion and duration of surgical drainages and tubes were apparently reduced. The mean blood glucose level was higher at the beginning of anesthesia but lower on POD1 and 3 in the ERAS group (P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was detected in WBC counts and concentrations of hemoglobin and albumin between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05), while the concentrations of prealbumin on POD3 were higher and the CRP level on POD1 was lower in the ERAS group than the TRAD group (P < 0.01). The satisfaction rate of parents was only slightly higher, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.730). No obvious differences were observed in the aspects of NB resection (P = 0.462) and 30-day readmissions of surgery ward (P = 1.000).

conclusionThe application of ERAS protocols has a significant potential to accelerate perioperative rehabilitation in children undergoing abdominal and thoracic NBs' surgical resection.