Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487856›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2025

A Ducted, Biomimetic Nipple Improves Aspects of Infant Feeding Physiology and Performance in an Animal Model.

C J Mayerl, E B Kaczmarek, A E Smith, H E Shideler, M E Blilie, C E Edmonds, K E Steer, K Adjerid, S Howe, M L Johnson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C J MayerlDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. Christopher.mayerl@nau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0402-8388
E B KaczmarekDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
A E SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
H E ShidelerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
M E BlilieDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
C E EdmondsDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
K E SteerDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
K AdjeridDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
S HoweDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
M L JohnsonDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
N DanosDepartment of Biology, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
R Z GermanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.

Funding

The effect of sensory intervention on swallowing and respiration through neurological maturation in preterm infantsR01HD096881 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
The impact of biomimetic nipple on infant feeding functionR00HD105922 · NICHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI MAYERL, CHRISTOPHER · 2022 to 2024
$720k
The impact of a biomimetic nipple on infant performance during breast and bottle feedingR21HD105294 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 2022 to 2023
$429k
The impact of sensory intervention on motor output and feeding performance in term and preterm infantsK99HD105922 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MAYERL, CHRISTOPHER · 2021 to 2021
$114k
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD105922National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD096881National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21HD105294NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD105922NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD105922NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096881NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD105294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is widely regarded as the optimal form of feeding infants, as it provides both nutritional and physiological benefits. For example, breastfed infants generate greater intraoral suction and have higher amplitude muscle activities compared to bottle-fed infants, with downstream implications for motor function, development, and health. One mechanism that might explain these physiological differences is the structure of the nipple an infant is feeding on. Breasts in most mammals are ducted soft-tissue structures that require suction to be generated for milk to be released, whereas bottle nipples are hollow and allow milk to be acquired by compression of the nipple. We used a validated animal model (pigs) to test how being raised on a novel ducted nipple impacted feeding physiology and performance compared to infants raised on a standard (cisternic) nipple. At the end of infancy, we fed both groups with both nipple types and used high-speed videofluoroscopy synchronized with intraoral pressure measurements to evaluate feeding function. Nipple type did not have a profound impact on sucking or swallowing rates. However, when feeding on a ducted nipple, infant pigs raised on a ducted nipple generated more suction, consumed milk at a faster rate, swallowed larger boluses of milk, and had decreased likelihood of penetration and aspiration than those raised on a cisternic nipple. These data replicate those found when comparing breast- and bottle-fed infants, suggesting that a ducted, biomimetic nipple may provide bottle-fed infants with the physiologic benefits of breastfeeding.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsBreast FeedingDeglutitionNipplesSucking BehaviorAnimalsBottle FeedingFemaleHumansInfantModels, AnimalSwineAspirationBioinspirationBiomimeticDysphagiaFeeding

Identifiers

PMID39487856
PMCPMC12148015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.