Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487708›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2025

Community crime and safety: An investigation of gender differences in the daily stress process.

Jennifer W Robinette, Jennifer R Piazza, Robert S Stawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer W RobinettePsychology Department, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5860-8057
Jennifer R PiazzaDepartment of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA.
Robert S StawskiInstitute of Public Health and Wellbeing, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Funding

Neighborhood adversity and sensitivity to stress: a study of gene x environment interactions.R00AG055699 · NIA · CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINETTE, JENNIFER WILLIAMS · 2019 to 2021
$726k
National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging career development 4R00AG055699-03NIA NIH HHS R00 AG055699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the associations between community crime rates and affective well-being, and how that relationship may differ according to gender. Using data from the National Study of Daily Experiences and the Uniform Crime Reporting Program, the current study examined gender differences between daily affective experiences, crime rates, and perceptions of neighborhood safety. Although feeling unsafe in one's neighborhood was related to worse affective well-being (i.e., higher negative affect/lower positive affect) and larger affective responses to daily stressors, crime rates were not. Women's negative affect was more strongly tied to daily stressors, whereas men's was more strongly tied to lower perceived neighborhood safety. Findings reveal the importance of understanding factors, such as gender, that impact safety concerns beyond that from crime. They also suggest that increasing visibility within communities might dissuade perpetrators and enhance residents' feelings of safety.

Indexed as

CrimeResidence CharacteristicsSafetyStress, PsychologicalAdultAffectFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeighborhood CharacteristicsSex Factorsdaily stressorsgender differencesnegative affectperceived neighborhood safetypositive affectproperty crimeviolent crime

Identifiers

PMID39487708
PMCPMC11832109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.