ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: a selected group with low rate of radiation treatment during the last month of life?
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex high-precision radiotherapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), should only be offered to patients with sufficiently long survival. In the context of bone metastases radiotherapy, low rates of treatment close to the end of life, e.g. last 30 days (RT30), may serve as a quality of care indicator. While traditional, pain-relieving short-course regimens have been studied comprehensively, real-world SBRT results are still limited.
methodsRetrospective analysis (2010-2023, n = 1117 episodes) of patients with bone metastases treated with traditional single-fraction (8 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens (often 4 Gy × 5 or 3 Gy × 10) compared to stereotactic single-fraction (12-16 Gy × 1) or multi-fraction regimens.
resultsExcept for gender, almost all baseline variables were uneven distributed. Failure to complete fractionated radiotherapy was uncommon in the stereotactic (4%) and non-stereotactic group (3%), p = 1.0. With regard to RT30, relevant differences emerged (19% for 8-Gy single-fraction versus 0% for stereotactic single-fraction, p = 0.01). The corresponding figures were 11% for multi-fraction non-stereotactic and 2% for multi-fraction stereotactic, p = 0.08. Median overall survival was shortest after 8-Gy single-fraction irradiation (4.2 months) and longest after stereotactic multi-fraction treatment (13.9 months). Neither stereotactic radiotherapy nor multi-fraction treatment improved survival in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Factors significantly associated with longer survival included better performance status, lower LabBM score (5 standard blood test results), stable disease outside of irradiated area(s), metachronous distant metastases, longer time interval from metastatic disease to bone irradiation, and outpatient status.
conclusionThe implementation of SBRT for selected patients has resulted in low rates of non-completion and RT30. Optimal selection criteria remain to be determined, but in current clinical practice we exclude patients with poor performance status, unfavorable blood test results (high LabBM score) and progressive disease sites not amenable to SBRT. Established, guideline-endorsed short-course regimens, especially 8-Gy single-fraction treatment, continue to represent an important palliative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.