Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487478›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Cost of integrated immunization campaigns in Nigeria and Sierra Leone: bottom-up costing studies.

Laura Boonstoppel, Flavia Moi, Christina Banks, Florence Sibeudu, Divine Obodoechi, Kyle Borces, Obinna Onwujekwe, Logan Brenzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura BoonstoppelThinkWell, Geneva, Switzerland. lboonstoppel@thinkwell.global.
Flavia MoiThinkWell, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christina BanksThinkWell, Washington, D.C., USA.
Florence SibeuduNnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi campus, Awka, Nnewi, Nigeria.
Divine ObodoechiUniversity of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Kyle BorcesThinkWell, Washington, D.C., USA.
Obinna OnwujekweUniversity of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.
Logan BrenzelBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1139192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve the efficient use of scarce resources, low- and middle-income countries and development partners are increasingly encouraged to deliver multiple vaccines and other interventions in a single integrated campaign. However, little is known regarding the cost of delivering vaccines through integrated campaigns, and the extent to which efficiencies are achieved. To fill this evidence gap, we estimated the cost of integrated immunization campaigns in Nigeria and Sierra Leone, and the potential savings from integration.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective ingredients-based costing study from a payer perspective of a campaign held in 2019 in Sierra Leone with measles-rubella vaccine and oral polio vaccine, during which nutrition supplements were also offered in part of the country, and yellow fever campaigns held in three states in Nigeria in 2019 and 2020, where in one state (Anambra) meningococcal A vaccines were co-delivered. We collected data from 108 health facilities, all relevant administrative levels, and implementing partners. We estimated the full financial and economic cost of each campaign, the average unit cost of delivery, as well as the cost by activity and resource type. We also estimated the cost savings from integration in Anambra state by modelling out the cost of the alternative of two standalone campaigns.

resultsThe average financial delivery cost was $0.34 per dose in Sierra Leone, and the economic cost was $0.73 per dose. In Nigeria, the financial cost per dose was $0.29-$0.35 across the three states, and the economic cost per dose was $0.62-$0.85. Facilities and wards delivering more doses achieved a lower financial and economic unit cost of delivery, demonstrating evidence of economies of scale. We estimated that Anambra may have saved at least $1,204,133 in financial resources by integrating yellow fever and meningitis A vaccine delivery, amounting to $0.17 per dose delivered. When including opportunity costs, the economic cost saving was estimated at $0.34 per dose delivered.

conclusionsThe study offers evidence on what it costs to deliver integrated campaigns, and shows that integrated delivery is likely to result in significant cost savings. Where high delivery volumes can be achieved, integrated campaigns can benefit from economies of scale. The findings can be used to inform planning and budgeting for immunization campaigns in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsHumansNigeriaRetrospective StudiesSierra LeoneCampaignCostingImmunizationIntegrationMeasles-rubella vaccineMeningitis A vaccineNigeriaOral polio vaccineSierra LeoneYellow fever vaccine

Identifiers

PMID39487478
PMCPMC11529071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.