Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487434›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Bayesian additive regression trees for predicting childhood asthma in the CHILD cohort study.

Mojtaba Ahmadiankalati, Himani Boury, Padmaja Subbarao, Wendy Lou, Zihang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The evolution of scientific knowledge in childhood asthma over time.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mojtaba AhmadiankalatiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Himani BouryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Padmaja SubbaraoDepartment of Pediatrics and Translational Medicine, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wendy LouDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Zihang LuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. zihang.lu@queensu.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is a heterogeneous disease that affects millions of children and adults. There is a lack of objective gold standard diagnosis that spans the ages; instead, diagnoses are made by clinician assessment based on a cluster of signs, symptoms and objective tests dependent on age. Yet, there is a clear morbidity associated with chronic asthma symptoms. Machine learning has become a popular tool to improve asthma diagnosis and classification. There is a paucity of literature on the use of Bayesian machine learning algorithms to predict asthma diagnosis in children. This paper develops a prediction model using the Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) and compares its performance to various machine learning algorithms in predicting the diagnosis of childhood asthma.

methodsClinically relevant variables collected at or before 3 years of age from 2794 participants in the CHILD Cohort Study were used to predict physician-diagnosed asthma at age 5. BART and six other commonly used machine learning algorithms, namely adaptive boosting, logistic regression, decision tree, neural network, random forest, and support vector machine were trained. Measures of performance including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated. The confidence intervals were calculated using Bootstrapping samples. Important predictors and interaction effects associated with asthma were also identified using BART.

resultsBART, logistic regression and random forest showed the highest area under the ROC curve compared to other machine learning algorithms. Based on BART, recurrent wheeze, respiratory infection and food sensitization at 3 years of age were the most important predictors. The three most important interaction effects were found to be interaction terms of respiratory infection at 3 years and recurrent wheezing at 3 years, maternal asthma and paternal asthma, and maternal wheezing and inhalant sensitization of child at 3 years.

conclusionsBART demonstrated promising prediction performance when compared to other machine learning algorithms. Future research could validate the BART in an external cohort to evaluate its reliability and generalizability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAsthmaBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDecision TreesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleRespiratory SoundsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAsthmaBayesian additive regression treeCHILD Cohort StudyMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID39487434
PMCPMC11529447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.