Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487431›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Efficient brain tumor grade classification using ensemble deep learning models.

Sankar M, Baiju Bv, Preethi D, Ananda Kumar S, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Mohd Asif Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sankar MDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr, Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India.
Baiju BvSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, TamilNadu, India.
Preethi DDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
Ananda Kumar SSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, TamilNadu, India.
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, India.
Mohd Asif ShahDepartment of Economics, Kardan University, Parwane Du, Kabul, 1001, Afghanistan. m.asif@kardan.edu.af.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting brain tumors early on is critical for effective treatment and life-saving efforts. The analysis of the brain with MRI scans is fundamental to the diagnosis because it contains detailed structural views of the brain, which is vital in identifying any of its abnormalities. The other option of performing an invasive biopsy is very painful and uncomfortable, which is not the case with MRI as it is free from surgically invasive margins and pieces of equipment. This helps patients to feel more at ease and hasten the diagnostic procedure, allowing physicians to formulate and practice action plans quicker. It is very difficult to locate a human brain tumor by manual because MRI scans produce large numbers of three-dimensional images. Complete applicability of pre-written computerized diagnostics, affords high possibilities in providing areas of interest earlier through the application of machine learning techniques and algorithms. The proposed work in the present study was to develop a deep learning model which will classify brain tumor grade images (BTGC), and hence enhance accuracy in diagnosing patients with different grades of brain tumors using MRI. A MobileNetV2 model, was used to extract the features from the images. This model increases the efficiency and generalizability of the model further. In this study, six standard Kaggle brain tumor MRI datasets were used to train and validate the developed and tested model of a brain tumor detection and classification algorithm into several types. This work consists of two key components: (i) brain tumor detection and (ii) classification of the tumor. The tumor classifications are conducted in both three classes (Meningioma, Pituitary, and glioma) and two classes (malignant, benign). The model has been reported to detect brain tumors with 99.85% accuracy, to distinguish benign and malignant tumors with 99.87% accuracy, and to type meningioma, pituitary, and glioma tumors with 99.38% accuracy. The results of this study indicate that the described technique is useful in the detection and classification of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm GradingAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBrain tumorBrain tumor grade classificationComputerized diagnosticsMachine learningMagnetic resonance image

Identifiers

PMID39487431
PMCPMC11529038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.