ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Imaging and clinical manifestations of hematogenous dissemination in melioidosis.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there is a high incidence of hematogenous infections in melioidosis, a tropical infectious disease, there are few systematic analyses of hematogenous melioidosis in imaging articles. A comprehensive clinical and imaging evaluation of hematogenous melioidosis be conducted in order to achieve early diagnosis of the disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an analysis of 111 cases of melioidosis diagnosed by bacteriological culture between August 2001 and September 2022. The analysis focused on observing the main manifestations of chest imaging and clinical data, including nodules, cavities, consolidation, ground glass opacity(GGO), pleural effusion, centrilobular nodules, and temperature, leucocyte count, diabetes, etc. Our study involved univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant diagnostic variables and risk predictive factors.
resultsA total of 71.2% (79/111) of melioidosis cases were caused by hematogenous infection, and the most common organ involved was the lungs (88.5%, 100/113). The incidence of sepsis in patients with lung abnormalities was high (73%, 73/100), and the mortality rate of septic shock was 22% (22/100). Univariate analysis showed that the radiologic signs of blood culture-positive cases were more likely to have bilateral pulmonary and subpleural nodules (p = 0.003), bilateral GGO (p = 0.001), bilateral hydrothorax (p = 0.011). The multivariate analysis revealed a significant improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) when comparing the model that included both clinical and radiologic variables to the model with clinical variables alone. The AUC increased from 0.818 to 0.932 (p = 0.012). The most important variables in the logistic regression with backward elimination were found to be nodule, GGO, and diabetes.
conclusionThe combination of CT features and clinical variables provided a valuable and timely warning for blood borne infectious melioidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.