ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Analysis and Visualization of Inter-/Intra-surgeon Variability Using Surgical Simulation for Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection Repair.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There may be inter-/intra-surgeon variability in the repair of congenital heart defects. The objective was to analyze and visualize inter-/intra-surgeon variability in the level of patch suture lines and in the shape and size of patches developed through surgical simulation for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (PAPVC) repair using a patient-specific 3D-printed heart model. A patient with PAPVC and preoperative computed tomography data were selected, and a patient-specific heart model was obtained. Two different exposures on the model were tested. Two surgeons were enrolled. Both surgeons performed a single-patch repair on four heart models with one exposure and four models with the other. On the potential suture line, 20 points common in each model were allocated. The level of patch suture lines was represented as a deviation from the 20 points. The shape and size of the patches were analyzed and visualized using geometric morphometrics approaches, using the 20 points as landmarks to represent the patches. There was inter-surgeon variability in the level of patch suture lines, and the variability was higher in particular locations. There was inter-surgeon variability in the shape and size of patches, which was not affected by the exposures. The inter-surgeon variability in the shape of patches was higher in particular locations. There was intra-surgeon variability in the shape of patches. Inter-/intra-surgeon variability was analyzed and visualized by the surgical simulation using geometric morphometrics approaches. Further studies are needed to scrutinize whether the variability affects postoperative hemodynamics in actual surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39487322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.