Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487262›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Prognostic nomogram model based on quantitative metrics of subregions surrounding residual cavity in glioblastoma patients.

Lijuan Gao, Tao Yuan, Yawu Liu, Xiaoyun Yang, Yiming Li, Guanmin Quan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lijuan GaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
Tao YuanDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
Yawu LiuDepartment of Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Xiaoyun YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yiming LiCollege of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. 57710441@qq.com.
Guanmin QuanDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China. quanguanmin@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hyperintensity area surrounding the residual cavity on postoperative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image is a potential site for glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence. This study aimed to develop a nomogram using quantitative metrics from subregions of this area, prior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT), to predict early GBM recurrence.

methodsAdult patients with GBM diagnosed between October 2018 and October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Quantitative metrics, including the mean, maximum, minimum, median values, and standard deviation of FLAIR signal intensity (SI) (measured using 3D-Slicer software), were extracted from the following subregions surrounding the residual cavity on post-contrast T1-weighted (CE-T1WI)-FLAIR fusion images: the enhancing region (ER), non-enhancing region (NER), and combined ER + NER. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses and were incorporated into the prediction nomogram model. The model's performance was evaluated using the C-index, calibration curves, and decision curves.

resultsA total of 129 adult GBM patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a training (n = 90) and a validation cohorts (n = 39) in a 7:3 ratio. Sixty-nine patients experienced postoperative recurrence. Cox regression analysis identified subventricular zone involvement, the median FLAIR intensity in the ER, the rFLAIR (relative FLAIR intensity compared to the contralateral normal region) of ER + NER, and corpus callosum involvement as independent prognostic factors. For predicting recurrence within 1 year after surgery, the nomogram model had a C-index of 0.733 in the training cohort and 0.746 in the validation cohort. Based on the nomogram score, post-operative GBM patients could be stratified into high- and low-risk for recurrence.

conclusionsNomogram models which based on quantitative metrics from FLAIR hyperintensity subregions may serve as potential markers for assessing GBM recurrence risk. This approach could enhance clinical decision-making and provide an alternative method for recurrence estimation in GBM patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNomogramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaMagnetic resonance imagingNomogramPostoperativeRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39487262
PMCPMC11530551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.