Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The role of adjuvant endocrine treatment in ER+, PR-, HER2- early breast cancer: a retrospective study of real-world data.

Miaochun Zhong, Xiaoqiu Ren, Wenjie Xia, Yangyang Qian, Kewang Sun, Jun Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miaochun Zhong *General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoqiu Ren *Center of Clinical Pharmacology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenjie XiaGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yangyang QianGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Kewang SunGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jun WuGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. junwu@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province No.2023KY046Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province No.2023KY543Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of Zhejiang Province No. LGF21H160030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstrogen receptor-positive (ER+), progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) often developed resistance to endocrine treatment (ET). We aimed to explore (1) the different clinicopathological features between ER+/PR+/HER2- and ER+/PR-/HER2- BC, and (2) whether ER+/PR-/HER2- early BC patients could benefit from adjuvant ET.

methodsAll patients treated for ER+/HER2- early BC who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2021 from a BC database in China were retrospectively examined. The cases followed up for less than six months were excluded.

resultsThe records of ER+/PR+/HER2- (n = 10843) and ER+/PR-/HER2- BC (n = 1193) cases were reviewed, with median follow-up times of 35.8 and 47.0 months, respectively. Compared with ER+/PR+/HER2- cases, ER+/PR-/HER2- BC occurred more in postmenopausal women (73.1% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.000) and were more likely to be T > 2 cm (40.6% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.048) and Ki67 > 20%+ (48.1% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.000). However, ER+/PR-/HER2- cases had fewer nodal involvement (32.9% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.000). Approximately 82.2% (981/1193) of ER+/PR-/HER2- patients received ET, while approximately 17.8% (212/1193) did not. Compared to patients did not receive adjuvant ET, the ET group had similar disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-2.59, p = 0.444) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.37-3.68, p = 0.799). 65.7% of recurrent ER+/PR-/HER2- patients experienced distant relapse (65.7% vs. 48.2% (for ER+/PR + cases), p = 0.011). By comparison, recurrent ER+/PR+/HER2- patients were more likely to experience only local relapse (31.6% vs. 14.9% (for ER+/PR- cases), p = 0.007).

conclusionsER+/PR-/HER2- BC was a special subtype with aggressive clinicopathological features and more tend to have distant metastasis rather than nodal involvement or local relapse. ER+/PR-/HER2- early BC did not seem to benefit from adjuvant ET.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerEndocrine therapy resistanceHormone receptor-positive breast cancerOutcomes research

Identifiers

PMID39487260
PMCPMC11530533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.