Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487231›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Modular and extendable 1D-simulation for microfluidic devices.

Maria Emmerich, Florina Costamoling, Robert Wille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria EmmerichTechnical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstrasse 21, 80333, Munich, Germany. maria.emmerich@tum.de.
Florina CostamolingJohannes Kepler University Linz (JKU), Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Robert WilleTechnical University of Munich (TUM), Arcisstrasse 21, 80333, Munich, Germany. robert.wille@tum.de.

Funding

Oesterreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft FFG, Grant Reference Number 890068 890068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic devices have been the subject of considerable attention in recent years. The development of novel microfluidic devices, their evaluation, and their validation requires simulations. While common methods based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can be time-consuming, 1D simulation provides an appealing alternative that leads to efficient results with reasonable quality. Current 1D simulation tools cover specific microfluidic applications; however, these tools are still rare and not widely adopted. There is a need for a more versatile and adaptable tool that covers novel applications, like mixing and the addition of membranes, and allows easy extension, resulting in one comprehensive 1D simulation tool for microfluidic devices. In this work, we present an open-source, modular, and extendable 1D simulation approach for microfluidic devices, which is available as an open-source software package at https://github.com/cda-tum/mmft-modular-1D-simulator. To this end, we propose an implementation that consists of a base module (providing the core functionality) that can be extended with dedicated application-specific modules (providing dedicated support for common microfluidic applications such as mixing, droplets, membranes, etc.). Case studies show that this indeed allows to efficiently simulate a broad spectrum of microfluidic applications in a quality that matches previous results or even fabricated devices.

Indexed as

AbstractionDropletMembraneMicrofluidicsSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39487231
PMCPMC11530630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.