Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487199›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Integrative hybrid deep learning for enhanced breast cancer diagnosis: leveraging the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database and the CBIS-DDSM dataset.

Patnala S R Chandra Murty, Chinta Anuradha, P Appala Naidu, Deenababu Mandru, Maram Ashok, Athiraja Atheeswaran, Nagalingam Rajeswaran, V Saravanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors on Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patnala S R Chandra MurtyDepartment of CSE, Malla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Maisammaguda, Secunderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Chinta AnuradhaDepartment of CSE, Velagapudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College (Deemed to be University), Kanuru, Vijayawada, 520007, Andhra Pradesh, India.
P Appala NaiduDepartment of CSE, Raghu Engineering College (Autonomous), Visakhapatnam, 531162, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Deenababu MandruDepartment of IT, Malla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Maisammaguda, Secunderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Maram AshokDepartment of CSE, Malla Reddy College of Engineering, Maisammaguda, Secunderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Athiraja AtheeswaranDepartment of CSE (AIML), Malla Reddy College of Engineering, Secunderabad, India.
Nagalingam RajeswaranDepartment of IQAC, IMS Unison University, Dehradun, India.
V SaravananDepartment of Computer Science, Dambi Dollo University, Dambi Dollo, Ethiopia. saravanan@dadu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to improve the diagnosis of breast cancer by combining two significant datasets: the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database and the DDSM Curated Breast Imaging Subset (CBIS-DDSM). The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database provides a detailed examination of the characteristics of cell nuclei, including radius, texture, and concavity, for 569 patients, of which 212 had malignant tumors. In addition, the CBIS-DDSM dataset-a revised variant of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM)-offers a standardized collection of 2,620 scanned film mammography studies, including cases that are normal, benign, or malignant and that include verified pathology data. To identify complex patterns and trait diagnoses of breast cancer, this investigation used a hybrid deep learning methodology that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with the stochastic gradients method. The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database is used for CNN training, while the CBIS-DDSM dataset is used for fine-tuning to maximize adaptability across a variety of mammography investigations. Data integration, feature extraction, model development, and thorough performance evaluation are the main objectives. The diagnostic effectiveness of the algorithm was evaluated by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The generalizability of the model will be validated by independent validation on additional datasets. This research provides an accurate, comprehensible, and therapeutically applicable breast cancer detection method that will advance the field. These predicted results might greatly increase early diagnosis, which could promote improvements in breast cancer research and eventually lead to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDeep LearningMammographyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWisconsinAUC-ROCCBIS-DDSMCNNWisconsin Breast Cancer Database

Identifiers

PMID39487199
PMCPMC11530441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.