ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrative hybrid deep learning for enhanced breast cancer diagnosis: leveraging the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database and the CBIS-DDSM dataset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Classification of Salivary Gland Tumors on Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable Breast Cancer Detection Using Hierarchical Multi-Scale and Edge-Aware Transformer Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid MICO-LAC Segmentation with Panoptic Tumor Instance Analysis for Dense Breast Mammograms.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI and Big Data in Oncology: A Physician-Centered Perspective on Emerging Clinical and Research Applications.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Explainable Mammogram Analysis with EfficientNetV2 and Grad-CAM++ for Robust Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- LBNet: an optimized lightweight CNN for mammographic breast cancer classification with XAI-based interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A multi stage deep learning model for accurate segmentation and classification of breast lesions in mammography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Intervertebral disc anomaly intelligent classification system based on deep learning, IDAICS.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this investigation was to improve the diagnosis of breast cancer by combining two significant datasets: the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database and the DDSM Curated Breast Imaging Subset (CBIS-DDSM). The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database provides a detailed examination of the characteristics of cell nuclei, including radius, texture, and concavity, for 569 patients, of which 212 had malignant tumors. In addition, the CBIS-DDSM dataset-a revised variant of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM)-offers a standardized collection of 2,620 scanned film mammography studies, including cases that are normal, benign, or malignant and that include verified pathology data. To identify complex patterns and trait diagnoses of breast cancer, this investigation used a hybrid deep learning methodology that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with the stochastic gradients method. The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Database is used for CNN training, while the CBIS-DDSM dataset is used for fine-tuning to maximize adaptability across a variety of mammography investigations. Data integration, feature extraction, model development, and thorough performance evaluation are the main objectives. The diagnostic effectiveness of the algorithm was evaluated by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The generalizability of the model will be validated by independent validation on additional datasets. This research provides an accurate, comprehensible, and therapeutically applicable breast cancer detection method that will advance the field. These predicted results might greatly increase early diagnosis, which could promote improvements in breast cancer research and eventually lead to improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.