Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487193›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Information mismatch in PHH3-assisted mitosis annotation leads to interpretation shifts in H&E slide analysis.

Jonathan Ganz, Christian Marzahl, Jonas Ammeling, Emely Rosbach, Barbara Richter, Chloé Puget, Daniela Denk, Elena A Demeter, Flaviu A Tăbăran, Gabriel Wasinger and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Phospho-Histone H3 as a Tool for Improved Mitotic Counting and Risk Assessment in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Study of 241 Cases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jonathan GanzTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Christian MarzahlGestalt Diagnostics, Spokane, USA.
Jonas AmmelingTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Emely RosbachTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
Barbara RichterUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Chloé PugetFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Daniela DenkLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Elena A DemeterCornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Flaviu A TăbăranUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Gabriel WasingerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karoline LipnikUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Marco TecillaUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Matthew J ValentineRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, St. Kitts and Nevis.
Michael J DarkUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Niklas AbeleUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Pompei BolfaRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, St. Kitts and Nevis.
Ramona ErberUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert KlopfleischFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie MerzIDEXX Laboratories, Kornwestheim, Germany.
Taryn A DonovanThe Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, New York, USA.
Samir JabariUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Christof A BertramUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina BreiningerFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Marc AubrevilleTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany. marc.aubreville@hs-flensburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker, as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. In a computer-aided setting, deep learning algorithms can help to mitigate this, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithms' performance. Unlike H&E, where identification of MFs is based mainly on morphological features, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H&E staining alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce an interpretation shift and even label noise into the H&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. Subsequently, MF detectors, including a novel dual-stain detector, were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement significantly increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling (F1: 0.53 to 0.74). However, this enhancement in label consistency did not translate to improved performance for H&E-based detectors, neither during the training phase nor the evaluation phase. Conversely, the dual-stain detector was able to benefit from the higher consistency. This reveals an information mismatch between the H&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect, which renders PHH3-assisted annotations not well-aligned for use with H&E-based detectors. Based on our findings, we propose an improved PHH3-assisted labeling procedure.

Indexed as

HistonesMitosisAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsStaining and LabelingHistones

Identifiers

PMID39487193
PMCPMC11530454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.