Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487185›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Narrative predicts cardiac synchrony in audiences.

Hugo Hammond, Michael Armstrong, Graham A Thomas, Edwin S Dalmaijer, David R Bull, Iain D Gilchrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hugo HammondSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. hugo.hammond@hotmail.co.uk.
Michael ArmstrongBritish Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) Research and Development, Salford, UK.
Graham A ThomasBritish Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) Research and Development, Salford, UK.
Edwin S DalmaijerSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
David R BullBristol Vision Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Iain D GilchristSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R511857/1United Kingdom Research and Innovation SIPF00006/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audio-visual media possesses a remarkable ability to synchronise audiences' neural, behavioural, and physiological responses. This synchronisation is considered to reflect some dimension of collective attention or engagement with the stimulus. But what is it about these stimuli that drives such strong engagement? There are several properties of media stimuli which may lead to synchronous audience response: from low-level audio-visual features, to the story itself. Here, we present a study which separates low-level features from narrative by presenting participants with the same content but in separate modalities. In this way, the presentations shared no low-level features, but participants experienced the same narrative. We show that synchrony in participants' heart rate can be driven by the narrative information alone. We computed both visual and auditory perceptual saliency for the content and found that narrative was approximately 10 times as predictive of heart rate as low-level saliency, but that low-level audio-visual saliency has a small additive effect towards heart rate. Further, heart rate synchrony was related to a separate cohorts' continuous ratings of immersion, and that synchrony is likely to be higher at moments of increased narrative importance. Our findings demonstrate that high-level narrative dominates in the alignment of physiology across viewers.

Indexed as

Heart RateNarrationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAudiencesImmersionNarrativePhysiological synchronyStory

Identifiers

PMID39487185
PMCPMC11530447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.