ArticleScientific reports2024
Relationship between corneal hysteresis and the site of damage to peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in open-angle glaucoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Underestimation of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) After LASIK and PRK: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sectoral Analysis of Corneal Thickness in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes and Its Relationship with RNFL and Rim Area.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Long-Term Visual Field Variability in Patients With Normal-Tension Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal hysteresis (CH) is associated with glaucomatous structural changes. We retrospectively investigated the association between CH and the regional circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (cpRNFLT) in 419 eyes of 419 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). CH was used as the explanatory variable, and cpRNFLT (total and quadrant) was used as the dependent variable. Standardized β coefficients were compared both overall and between the NTG and POAG groups. Multiple regression analysis with CH as the explanatory variable and cpRNFLT parameters as the dependent variables suggested that even after adjusting for age, sex, intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length, and central corneal thickness, all areas of the cpRNFLT were significantly associated with CH, except for the nasal quadrant. In the stratified analysis by glaucoma type, a positive relationship between CH and regional cpRNFLT tended to be maintained in the NTG group but not in the POAG group (P = 0.060 for interaction). Additionally, in the NTG group, the CH-inferior cpRNFLT relationship was particularly strong in the less-IOP fluctuation group. These results suggest that CH may be a potential predictor of anatomical vulnerability around the optic nerve, particularly enhancing the inferior regions of NTG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.