Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487147›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Intravascular delivery of an ultraflexible neural electrode array for recordings of cortical spiking activity.

Xingzhao Wang, Shun Wu, Hantao Yang, Yu Bao, Zhi Li, Changchun Gan, Yuanyuan Deng, Junyan Cao, Xue Li, Yun Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review of Recent Advances in Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces for the Restoration of Motor Function in Patients With Paralysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xingzhao WangInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shun WuInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hantao YangShanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Yu BaoInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Zhi LiFudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changchun GanInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yuanyuan DengShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Junyan CaoUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Xue LiInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yun WangZhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chi RenInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. renc@ion.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-8516
Zhigang YangZhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China. yang.zhigang1@zs-hospital.sh.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6278-3130
Zhengtuo ZhaoInstitute of Neuroscience, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. zhaozt@ion.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2476-1560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although intracranial neural electrodes have significantly contributed to both fundamental research and clinical treatment of neurological diseases, their implantation requires invasive surgery to open craniotomies, which can introduce brain damage and disrupt normal brain functions. Recent emergence of endovascular neural devices offers minimally invasive approaches for neural recording and stimulation. However, existing endovascular neural devices are unable to resolve single-unit activity in large animal models or human patients, impeding a broader application as neural interfaces in clinical practice. Here, we present the ultraflexible implantable neural electrode as an intravascular device (uFINE-I) for recording brain activity at single-unit resolution. We successfully implanted uFINE-Is into the sheep occipital lobe by penetrating through the confluence of sinuses and recorded both local field potentials (LFPs) and multi-channel single-unit spiking activity under spontaneous and visually evoked conditions. Imaging and histological analysis revealed minimal tissue damage and immune response. The uFINE-I provides a practical solution for achieving high-resolution neural recording with minimal invasiveness and can be readily transferred to clinical settings for future neural interface applications such as brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) and the treatment of neurological diseases.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedAction PotentialsAnimalsBrain-Computer InterfacesNeuronsOccipital LobeSheep

Identifiers

PMID39487147
PMCPMC11530632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.