Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487084›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

GGN-GO: geometric graph networks for predicting protein function by multi-scale structure features.

Jia Mi, Han Wang, Jing Li, Jinghong Sun, Chang Li, Jing Wan, Yuan Zeng, Jingyang Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial Intelligence Powers Protein Functional Annotation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jia MiThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-4288
Han WangThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.
Jing LiThe College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.
Jinghong SunThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.
Chang LiThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.
Jing WanThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.
Yuan ZengMicrobial Resource and Big Data Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Jingyang GaoThe College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have led to an explosion of genomic and transcriptomic data, offering a wealth of protein sequence information. However, the functions of most proteins remain unannotated. Traditional experimental methods for annotation of protein functions are costly and time-consuming. Current deep learning methods typically rely on Graph Convolutional Networks to propagate features between protein residues. However, these methods fail to capture fine atomic-level geometric structural features and cannot directly compute or propagate structural features (such as distances, directions, and angles) when transmitting features, often simplifying them to scalars. Additionally, difficulties in capturing long-range dependencies limit the model's ability to identify key nodes (residues). To address these challenges, we propose a geometric graph network (GGN-GO) for predicting protein function that enriches feature extraction by capturing multi-scale geometric structural features at the atomic and residue levels. We use a geometric vector perceptron to convert these features into vector representations and aggregate them with node features for better understanding and propagation in the network. Moreover, we introduce a graph attention pooling layer captures key node information by adaptively aggregating local functional motifs, while contrastive learning enhances graph representation discriminability through random noise and different views. The experimental results show that GGN-GO outperforms six comparative methods in tasks with the most labels for both experimentally validated and predicted protein structures. Furthermore, GGN-GO identifies functional residues corresponding to those experimentally confirmed, showcasing its interpretability and the ability to pinpoint key protein regions. The code and data are available at: https://github.com/MiJia-ID/GGN-GO.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsgeometric graph networksgraph attention poolinggraph contrastive learningmulti-scale structural featuresprotein function prediction

Identifiers

PMID39487084
PMCPMC11530295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.