Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487035›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024

Impact of Porosity and Stiffness of 3D Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds on Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Activation of Dendritic Cells.

Mehmet Serhat Aydin, Nora Marek, Theo Luciani, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Bodil Lund, Cecilie Gjerde, Kamal Mustafa, Salwa Suliman, Ahmad Rashad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Osteogenic Potential of 3D-Printed Porous Poly(lactide-ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehmet Serhat AydinCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-1753
Nora MarekCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.
Theo LucianiCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.
Samih Mohamed-AhmedCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-8895
Bodil LundDepartment of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
Cecilie GjerdeCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.
Kamal MustafaCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2968-2856
Salwa SulimanCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.
Ahmad RashadCenter of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen 5009, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9809-8760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the potential of extrusion-based printing of thermoplastic polymers in bone tissue engineering, the inherent nonporous stiff nature of the printed filaments may elicit immune responses that influence bone regeneration. In this study, bone scaffolds made of polycaprolactone (PCL) filaments with different internal microporosity and stiffness was 3D-printed. It was achieved by combining three fabrication techniques, salt leaching and 3D printing at either low or high temperatures (LT/HT) with or without nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS). Printing PCL at HT resulted in stiff scaffolds (modulus of elasticity (E): 403 ± 19 MPa and strain: 6.6 ± 0.1%), while NIPS-based printing at LT produced less stiff and highly flexible scaffolds (E: 53 ± 10 MPa and strain: 435 ± 105%). Moreover, the introduction of porosity by salt leaching in the printed filaments significantly changed the mechanical properties and degradation rate of the scaffolds. Furthermore, this study aimed to show how these variations influence proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSC) and the maturation and activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC). The cytocompatibility of the printed scaffolds was confirmed by live-dead imaging, metabolic activity measurement, and the continuous proliferation of hBMSC over 14 days. While all scaffolds facilitated the expression of osteogenic markers (RUNX2 and Collagen I) from hBMSC as detected through immunofluorescence staining, the variation in porosity and stiffness notably influenced the early and late mineralization. Furthermore, the flexible LT scaffolds, with porosity induced by NIPS and salt leaching, stimulated Mo-DC to adopt a pro-inflammatory phenotype marked by a significant increase in the expression of IL1B and TNF genes, alongside decreased expression of anti-inflammatory markers, IL10 and TGF1B. Altogether, the results of the current study demonstrate the importance of tailoring porosity and stiffness of PCL scaffolds to direct their biological performance toward a more immune-mediated bone healing process.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationDendritic CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisPolyestersPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansPorosityTissue EngineeringpolycaprolactonePolyestersBone tissue engineeringDegradationImmune-mediated bone regenerationMicroporosityNonsolvent induced phase separationSalt leaching

Identifiers

PMID39487035
PMCPMC11632652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.