Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487030›Full record

ReviewClinics in perinatology2024

Maternal-Child Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinical Trials Networks across the Ages.

Sharon Nachman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. BeyondFrontiers in genetics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sharon NachmanPediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Renaissance School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 101 Nicholls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8111, USA. Electronic address: Sharon.nachman@stonybrookmedicine.edu.

Funding

LOC-IMPAACT Leadership GroupPharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant Women in the USUM1AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI Jennifer Jao, Sharon A Nachman · 2011 to 2026
$278.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center-Pediatric,Adolescent, and Maternal CTGUM1AI068616 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Sean Scott Brummel, Marlene Ann Cooper · 2011 to 2026
$155.6M
LC - IMPAACT Leadership GroupUM1AI106716 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$47.2M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068616NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106716NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201800001I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical trial networks that included a maternal-child focus have evolved since first funded by NIH in the 1990s. Since then, US domestic and international sites were combined into one network, with a focused agenda on therapeutics (for both prevention and treatment), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cure, tuberculosis, and complications of HIV, largely specific to the brain. Key to the success of the network has been a strong partnership with the community, collaborations with industry and other strategic partners, and recognition that one size does not fit all when it comes to antiretrovirals, diagnosing and treating TB, and other treatments for our populations.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHIV InfectionsChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousUnited StatesClinical trial networkMaternal HIVPediatric HIV

Identifiers

PMID39487030
PMCPMC11531646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.