Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39486780›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2024

Nanofibrous 3D scaffolds capable of individually controlled BMP and FGF release for the regulation of bone regeneration.

Kunal J Rambhia, Hongli Sun, Kai Feng, Rahasudha Kannan, Yasmine Doleyres, Jeremy M Holzwarth, Mikayla Doepker, Renny T Franceschi, Peter X Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Role of FGF2 in promoting osteogenic differentiation for craniofacial bone regeneration.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Advancing Nanomedicine: For Bone Defect Repair and Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kunal J RambhiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Hongli SunDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kai FengMacromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Rahasudha KannanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yasmine DoleyresMacromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jeremy M HolzwarthDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Mikayla DoepkerDepartment of Biology, Kalamazoo College, Kalamazoo, MI 49006, USA.
Renny T FranceschiDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Peter X MaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Macromolecular Science and Engineering Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: mapx@umich.edu.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ORGANOGENESIST32HD007505 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PASCA DI MAGLIANO, MARINA, SPENCE, JASON · 1997 to 2021
$6.9M
YR01DE011723 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FRANCESCHI, RENNY THEODORE · 1995 to 2017
$5.3M
PTH and Calcium Synergy for Craniofacial RegenerationR01DE022327 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCAULEY, LAURIE K. · 2012 to 2022
$3.8M
Regenerating cranial suture (Jaylynn Jones)R01DE027662 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HATCH, NAN E, MA, PETER X · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Orchestrating Bone Regeneration on Multiple ScalesR01DE017689 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MA, PETER X · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007505NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE011723NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017689NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022327NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current clinical applications of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are limited to only a few specific indications. Locally controlled delivery of combinations of growth factors can be a promising strategy to improve BMP-based bone repair. However, the success of this approach requires the development of an effective release system and the correct choice of growth factors capable of enhancing BMP activity. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, also known as FGF-2) has shown promise in promoting bone repair, although conflicting results have been reported. Considering the complex biological activities of FGF-2, we hypothesized that FGF-2 can promote BMP-induced bone regeneration only if the dosage and kinetic parameters of the two factors are individually tailored. In this study, we conducted systematic in vitro studies on cell proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization in response to factor dose, delivery mode (sequential or simultaneous), and release rate. Subsequently, we designed individually controlled BMP-7 and FGF-2 release poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanospheres attached to the poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) nanofibrous scaffolds. The data showed that BMP-7-induced bone formation was accelerated by a relatively higher FGF-2 dose (100 ng/scaffold) delivered at a faster release rate, or by a relatively lower FGF-2 dose (10 ng/scaffold) at a slower release rate in an in vivo bone regeneration model. In contrast, a very high dose of FGF-2 (1000 ng/scaffold) inhibited bone regeneration under all conditions. In vitro and in vivo data suggest that FGF-2 improved BMP-7-induced bone regeneration by coordinating FGF-2 dosage and release kinetics to enhance stem cell migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are the most potent growth/differentiation factors in bone development and regeneration. However, the clinical applications of BMPs have been limited to only a few specific indications due to the required supraphysiological dosages with the current BMP products and their side effects. Locally controlled delivery of BMPs and additional growth factors that can enhance their osteogenic potency are highly desired. However, different growth factors act with different mechanisms. Here we report a nanofibrous scaffold that mimics collagen in size and geometry and is immobilized with biodegradable nanospheres to achieve local and distinct release profiles of BMP7 and FGF2. Systematic studies demonstrated low dose BMP7 and FGF2 with different temporal release profiles can optimally enhance bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7Bone RegenerationFibroblast Growth Factor 2NanofibersTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationDelayed-Action PreparationsMiceOsteogenesisPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerBone Morphogenetic Protein 7Delayed-Action PreparationsFibroblast Growth Factor 2Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerBMP-7Bone regenerationControlled releaseFGF-2Nanofibrous scaffold

Identifiers

PMID39486780
PMCPMC12831993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.