Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39486521›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of nutrition2025

Microbiota-Focused Dietary Approaches to Support Health: A Systematic Review.

Veronica K Hindle, Nadine M Veasley, Hannah D Holscher

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms and clinical implications of gut-brain interactions.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronica K HindleDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Nadine M VeasleyDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Hannah D HolscherDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Personalized Nutrition Initiative, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States. Electronic address: hholsche@illinois.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet affects the intestinal microbiota. Increasingly, research is linking the intestinal microbiota to various human health outcomes. Consumption of traditional prebiotics (inulin, fructo-oligosaccharides, and galacto-oligosaccharides) confers health benefits through substrate utilization by select intestinal microorganisms, namely Bifidobacterium and Lactobacilli spp. A similar but distinct concept focused on microorganisms to support human health is through direct consumption of certain live microorganisms recognized as probiotics, which classically include Lactobacilli or Bifidobacterium strains. With advances in sequencing technologies and culturing techniques, other novel functional intestinal microorganisms are being increasingly identified and studied to determine how they may underpin human health benefits. These novel microorganisms are targeted for enrichment within the autochthonous intestinal microbiota through dietary approaches and are also gaining interest as next-generation probiotics because of their purported beneficial properties. Thus, characterizing dietary approaches that nourish select microorganisms in situ is necessary to propel biotic-focused research forward. As such, we reviewed the literature to summarize findings on dietary approaches that nourish the human intestinal microbiota and benefit health to help fill the gap in knowledge on the connections between certain microorganisms, the metabolome, and host physiology. The overall objective of this systematic review was to summarize the impact of dietary interventions with the propensity to nourish certain intestinal bacteria, affect microbial metabolite concentrations, and support gastrointestinal, metabolic, and cognitive health in healthy adults. Findings from the 17 randomized controlled studies identified in this systematic review indicated that dietary interventions providing dietary fibers, phytonutrients, or unsaturated fatty acids differentially enriched Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, and Ruminococcus species, with variable effects on microbial metabolites and subsequent associations with physiologic markers of gastrointestinal and metabolic health. These findings have implications for biotic-focused research on candidate prebiotic substrates as well as next-generation probiotics.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPrebioticsProbioticsPrebioticsdietary interventionsfibergut microbiotanext-generation probioticsprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID39486521
PMCPMC11867136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.