ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024
Disentangling the phenotypic patterns of hypertension and chronic hypotension.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theory and practice in biomedical informatics: a framework for discovery.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objective2017 blood pressure (BP) categories focus on cardiac risk. We hypothesize that studying the balance between mechanisms that increase or decrease BP across the medical phenome will lead to new insights. We devised a classifier that uses BP measures to assign individuals to mutually exclusive categories centered in the upper (Htn), lower (Hotn) and middle (Naf) zones of the BP spectrum; and examined the epidemiologic and phenotypic patterns of these BP-categories.
methodsWe classified a cohort of 832,560 deidentified electronic health records by BP-category; compared the frequency of BP-categories and four subtypes of Htn and Hotn by sex and age-decade; visualized the distributions of systolic, diastolic, mean arterial and pulse pressures stratified by BP-category; and ran Phenome-wide Association Studies (PheWAS) for Htn and Hotn. We paired knowledgebases for hypertension and hypotension and computed aggregate knowledgebase status (KB-status) indicating known associations. We assessed alignment of PheWAS results with KB-status for phecodes in the knowledgebase, and paired PheWAS correlations with KB-status to surface phenotypic patterns.
resultsBP-categories represent distinct distributions within the multimodal distributions of systolic and diastolic pressure. They are centered in the upper, lower, and middle zones of mean arterial pressure and provide a different signal than pulse pressure. For phecodes in the knowledgebase, 85% of positive correlations align with KB-status. Phenotypic patterns for Htn and Hotn overlap for several phecodes and are separate for others. Our analysis suggests five candidates for hypothesis testing research, two where the prevalence of the association with Htn or Hotn may be under appreciated, three where mechanisms that increase and decrease blood pressure may be affecting one another's expression.
conclusionPairedPheWAS methods may open a phenome-wide path to disentangling hypertension and chronic hypotension. Our classifier provides a starting point for assigning individuals to BP-categories representing the upper, lower, and middle zones of the BP spectrum. 4.7 % of individuals matching 2017 BP categories for normal, elevated BP or isolated hypertension, have diastolic pressure < 60. Research is needed to fine-tune the classifier, provide external validation, evaluate the clinical significance of diastolic pressure < 60, and test the candidate hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.