Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2025
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus carboplatin-based doublet as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer aged ≥70 years or with an ECOG performance status of 2 (GFPC 08-2015 ENERGY): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors in advanced/metastatic NSCLC: a meta-analysis based on RCTs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Challenges for first-line therapy in elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- International Consensus on Severe Lung Cancer-The Second Edition.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Advances in targeting vasculogenic mimicry in malignant tumors using monomeric compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicine (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Multidimensional Assessment of Neurological Adverse Reactions Related to PD-1 Inhibitors: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Safety profile of ipilimumab in elderly patients: a disproportionate analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Management of brain metastases in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Durvalumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive Stage IV NSCLC With an ECOG Performance Status of 2 to 3 and High PD-L1 Tumor Expression (IFCT-1802 SAVIMMUNE): A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with poor performance status or older patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Perioperative camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in China: three-year survival outcomes of phase 2 randomized controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Real-world outcomes and association between immune-related adverse events and therapeutic efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in elderly patients (≥75 years) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of toripalimab in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- A narrative review of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current progress, sensitization approaches, and synergistic strategies.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Aging population of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer: global, regional, and national burden-insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Sarcomatoid diffuse pleural mesothelioma in an 80-year-Old woman with long-term response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025Article
- Lung cancer tumor immune microenvironment: analyzing immune escape mechanisms and exploring emerging therapeutic targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Pathogen spectrum and management strategies for opportunistic infections in lung cancer in the immunotherapy era: recent advances from fungi to mycobacteria.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Breakthroughs in immune checkpoint therapy: overcoming NSCLC immune checkpoint therapy resistance with novel techniques.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombined treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies has shown superiority over chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but data for older patients (aged ≥70 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1 or those with an ECOG performance status of 2 are scarce. We aimed to test the superiority of the PD-1 antibody nivolumab and the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab over platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC aged 70 years or older or with an ECOG performance status of 2.
methodsThis open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 30 hospitals and cancer centres in France. Eligible patients had stage IV histologically proven NSCLC, with no known oncogenic alterations, and were either aged 70 years or older with ECOG performance status of 0-2 or younger than 70 years with an ECOG performance status of 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally, using a computer-generated algorithm stratified by age (<70 vs ≥70 years), ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve ≤700 mg] plus pemetrexed [500 mg/m
findingsThe trial was stopped early for futility on the basis of a pre-planned interim analysis after 33% of the expected events had occurred. Between Feb 12, 2018, and Dec 15, 2020, 217 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 216 patients were included in the final analysis, with 109 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 107 in the chemotherapy group; median age was 74 years (IQR 70-78). Median overall survival was 14·7 months (95% CI 8·0-19·7) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 9·9 months (7·7-12·3) in chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·16]). Among patients aged 70 years or older with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (median age 76 years [IQR 73-79]), median overall survival was longer in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group than the chemotherapy group: 22·6 months (95% CI 18·1-36·0) versus 11·8 months (8·9-20·5; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·46-0·96]). Among patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (median age 69 years [IQR 63-75]), median overall survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 1·4-4·8) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus 6·1 months (3·5-10·4) in the chemotherapy group (HR 1·32 [95% CI 0·82-2·11]). No new safety signals were reported. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (28 [27%] of 103 patients) in the chemotherapy group and endocrine disorders (five [5%] of 105 patients), cardiac disorders (ten [10%] patients), and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [11%] patients) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group.
interpretationThe study showed no benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in the overall study population. As a result of early stopping, the trial was underpowered for primary and secondary endpoints; however, the finding of better survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with platinum doublet in the subgroup of older patients with NSCLC with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 warrants further study.
fundingBristol-Myers Squibb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39486424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.