Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39486381›Full record

Trial reportJournal of biomechanics2024

Effects of increasing walking cadence on gait biomechanics in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Khara A James, Patrick Corrigan, Sheng-Che Yen, Christopher J Hasson, Irene S Davis, Joshua J Stefanik

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khara A JamesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02139, USA; Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: kjames@bwh.harvard.edu.
Patrick CorriganDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. Electronic address: patrick.corrigan@health.slu.edu.
Sheng-Che YenDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: s.yen@northeastern.edu.
Christopher J HassonDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: c.hasson@northeastern.edu.
Irene S DavisSchool of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: isdavis@usf.edu.
Joshua J StefanikDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: j.stefanik@northeastern.edu.

Funding

Research and Evaluation Support Core Unit (RESCU Core)P30AR072571 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI TUHINA NEOGI · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
The Relation of Altered Pain Processing to Impact Loading and Response to a Gait Retraining Treatment in Knee OsteoarthritisK23AR070913 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI STEFANIK, JOSHUA JON · 2017 to 2021
$828k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR070913NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait retraining is a strategy to manage altered loading patterns and pain characteristic of knee osteoarthritis. Lower walking cadence is associated with higher knee joint loading, vertical ground reaction forces, and risk for cartilage worsening. Therefore, we determined the acute effects of increasing walking cadence on measures of lower extremity loading and knee pain in knee osteoarthritis. Twenty-five participants with knee osteoarthritis (age = 62.5 ± 7.2; 76.0 % female) walked at fixed speed on an instrumented treadmill from which baseline cadence was measured. Five, randomized experimental cadence conditions (2 %, 4 %, 6 %, 8 %, or 10 % over baseline cadence) were completed. Real-time auditory and visual feedback on cadence was provided while kinematics and ground reaction forces were sampled. Linear mixed effects models evaluated the effect of cadence on knee adduction and flexion moment peaks and impulses, impact loading metrics (vertical ground reaction force impact peak, vertical average and instantaneous loading rates), and knee pain. Increasing cadence by 2-10 % did not significantly change knee adduction moment peaks or impulse. Peak knee flexion moment increased by 3-32 % and knee flexion moment impulse reduced by 2-9 % with increases in cadence, but these results were not significant (peak knee flexion moment, p = 0.070; knee flexion moment impulse, p = 0.085). Increasing cadence significantly increased the vertical impact peak (p < 0.001), and the vertical average (p = 0.010), and instantaneous (p = 0.007) loading rates. Small increases in cadence at a fixed gait speed does not significantly change surrogate measures of knee joint loading or pain, but does increase measures of impact loading.

Indexed as

GaitKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeWalkingAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWeight-BearingCadenceGait modificationKnee osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID39486381
PMCPMC12105867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.