Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39486085›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2024

Changes in perceived neighborhood social cohesion and self-assessed health: 17-year follow-up of the Dutch GLOBE study.

Vernon Cail, Joost Oude Groeniger, Mariëlle A Beenackers, Frank J van Lenthe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vernon CailDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost Oude GroenigerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0691-1679
Mariëlle A BeenackersDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-3391
Frank J van LentheDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Erasmus Initiative "Smarter Choices for Better Health,"European Commission Horizon 2020 ResearchEuropean Commission Horizon 2020 Research ProgramMarie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Innovative Training Networks 956780Netherlands Organization for Scientific ResearchNetherlands Organization for Scientific Research 09150161810158/VI.Veni.194.041NWOZonMw 09150161810158/VI.Veni.194.041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research has indicated that residents who perceive their neighborhood as more cohesive have better mental and physical health than those with lower perceived neighborhood social cohesion. However, because most studies are based on cross-sectional data, it remains unclear whether improving the perceptions of social cohesion leads to better health over time. This study applied random effects within-between models to examine the within-individual and between-individual associations of perceived neighborhood social cohesion and poor self-assessed health (SAH) in a cohort of Dutch adults with 17-year follow-up. We also tested whether such associations varied by age, educational level, and gender. The results of pooled analyses indicated that higher perceived neighborhood social cohesion was associated with better SAH [odds ratio (OR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65, 0.80], but did not find conclusive evidence that within-individual changes in perceived neighborhood social cohesion were associated with SAH (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.04). We also did not observe any moderating effects for age, educational level, or gender. This study provides some evidence that improving social cohesion in neighborhoods may be a beneficial health promotion strategy.

Indexed as

Health StatusResidence CharacteristicsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeighborhood CharacteristicsNetherlandsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID39486085
PMCPMC11631403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.