ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators for online genetic care for hereditary cancer in Japan: findings from surveys of both clients and medical professionals.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Adoption for Managing Chronic and Rare Diseases in Indonesia During and Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Medical care cost dynamics during COVID-19 pandemic: financial implications for Japanese health insurance system.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Uptake During and After Pandemic-Era Deregulation in Japan.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Challenges and Adaptive Strategies in Transitional Care During COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Experiences in Japan.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Authors' Reply: Japan's Telepsychiatry Dissemination: Current Status and Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Japan's Telepsychiatry Dissemination: Current Status and Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Mapping cognitive diversity in older adults through community-based digital screening via mobile devices: a cross-sectional latent class analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Considerations for Creating a User-Friendly Telemedicine Service in Japan.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelemedicine, or online medical care, has gained considerable attention worldwide. However, it has not been widely adopted in Japan, and the detailed status of received and provided online medical care and the reasons for its lack of popularity remain unknown.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the current status of online medical care in Japan and the factors limiting its adoption from the perspective of both patients receiving and medical professionals providing online medical care.
methodsIn total, 2 nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted. The first survey, targeting both patients and healthy individuals, screened approximately 40,000 participants among 13 million people. The participants were selected to match the age distribution of the Japanese population based on government data, and their online medical care experience and medical visit status were recorded. To further investigate online medical care use and satisfaction, a web-based survey was conducted with 15% (6000/40,000) of the screened participants. The second survey, targeting medical professionals, was administered to a physician, a nurse, and a member of the administrative staff in each of 4900 randomly selected medical facilities to inquire about their online medical care practices and impressions. In addition, both surveys investigated the factors limiting online medical care expansion in Japan.
resultsThe response rates among patients and healthy individuals targeted for the screening and main surveys were 92.5% (36,998/40,000) and ˃80% (1312/1478, 88.77%; 1281/1522, 84.17%; 404/478, 84.5%; and 2226/2522, 88.26% in 4 survey groups), respectively. The survey of medical professionals yielded 1552 responses (n=618, 39.82% physicians; n=428, 27.58% nurses; n=506, 32.6% administrative staff). Although the facility-level response rate was low (794/4900, 16.2%), some facility categories had relatively high response rates. Only 5.29% (1956/36,998) of the patients and healthy individuals had online medical care experience. When there were more hospitals nearby and they felt it was more work to see a physician in person, they were more likely to use online medical care (more nearby hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50; more work: aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.63 per survey response point in the patient group). Similarly, these factors were substantially associated with satisfaction (more nearby hospitals: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.73; more work: aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.27-1.76 per survey response point in the patient group). In both surveys, the most frequently selected factor preventing the widespread use of online medical care was patients' need to switch to face-to-face medical care for mandatory tests and procedures. Inadequate awareness of and education on online medical care were also frequently selected.
conclusionsOur nationwide surveys provided insights into the current status of online medical care in Japan and simultaneously identified several problems and issues related to it, which will be useful in promoting its wider adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.