Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485768›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Examining HPV vaccination behavior among young adults: Insights from applying the Health Belief Model.

Oluwafemifola Oyedeji, Kristina W Kintziger, Cary M Springer, Samantha Ehrlich, Jill Maples, Justin Gatwood, Cristina S Barroso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oluwafemifola OyedejiDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7548-2508
Kristina W KintzigerDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural, and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Cary M SpringerResearch Computing Support, Office of Innovative Technologies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Samantha EhrlichDepartment of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-8399
Jill MaplesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Justin GatwoodUS Health Outcomes GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Cristina S BarrosoDepartment of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-9058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite evidence-based recommendations for HPV vaccination, uptake among young adults is suboptimal. Limited research has explored factors that may influence HPV vaccination among young adults, as well as associated promotion and informational preferences in this group. This study aimed to examine factors associated with HPV vaccination among young adults and preferences for HPV vaccine information and promotion. METHODOLOGY: This study utilized a cross-sectional design to examine factors related to HPV vaccination among young adults on a university campus in Tennessee. Data were collected via an online survey administered to students, aged 18-26 years, from March-May 2023. Study measures included sociodemographic characteristics, health/healthcare-related factors, and perception-related measures. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

resultsOut of 402 participants that completed the survey, 209 reported being vaccinated against HPV. In the adjusted model, variables associated with HPV vaccination were perceived risk (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.05, 1.20), perceived barriers (aOR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.81), higher HPV knowledge (aOR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.33), and receipt of healthcare provider recommendations (aOR = 12.90; 95% CI: 7.08, 23.51).

conclusionsStudy findings suggest that those who are vaccinated were more likely to report receiving healthcare provider recommendations, low perceived barriers, higher HPV knowledge and perceived risk. Future HPV vaccination promotion efforts for young adults may consider increasing HPV vaccine knowledge and awareness, addressing barriers, and strengthening provider recommendations.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Belief ModelHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTennesseeYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39485768
PMCPMC11530009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.