Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Unsupervised learning for real-time and continuous gait phase detection.

Dollaporn Anopas, Yodchanan Wongsawat, Jetsada Arnin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dollaporn AnopasBiodesign Innovation Center, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-9885
Yodchanan WongsawatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jetsada ArninDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0198-6935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with lower limb impairment after a stroke or spinal cord injury require rehabilitation, but traditional methods can be challenging for both patients and therapists. Robotic systems have been developed to help; however, they currently cannot detect the continuous gait phase in real time, hindering their effectiveness. To address this limitation, researchers have attempted to develop gait phase detection in general using fuzzy logic algorithms and neural networks. However, there is a paucity of research on real-time and continuous gait phase detection. In light of this gap, we propose an unsupervised learning method for real-time and continuous gait phase detection. This method employs windows of real-time trajectories and a pre-trained model, utilizing trajectories from treadmill walking data, to detect the real-time and continuous gait phase of human on overground locomotion. The neural network model that we have developed exhibits an average time error of less than 11.51 ms across all walking conditions, indicating its suitability for real-time applications. Specifically, the average time error during overground walking at different speeds is 11.20 ms, which is comparatively lower than the average time error observed during treadmill walking, where it is 12.42 ms. By utilizing this method, we can predict the real-time phase using a pre-trained model from treadmill walking data collected with a full motion capture system, which can be performed in a laboratory setting, thereby eliminating the need for overground walking data, which can be more challenging to obtain due to the complexity of the setting.

Indexed as

GaitNeural Networks, ComputerUnsupervised Machine LearningAdultAlgorithmsFemaleFuzzy LogicHumansMaleWalking

Identifiers

PMID39485755
PMCPMC11530039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.