ArticlePloS one2024
Magnitude and factors associated with iron supplementation among pregnant women in anemia hot spot regions of Ethiopia: Multilevel analysis based on Bayesian approach.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to World Health Organization, pregnant women should take an oral iron and folic acid every day for at least 3 months to prevent preterm birth, low birth weight, maternal anemia, and puerperal sepsis. In addition to keeping maternal health, it also plays a key role to support the fetus's healthy growth and development. Therefore, it is very important to know the magnitude of iron supplementation and its determinants in anemia hot spot regions of Ethiopia using an appropriate statistical analysis method.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the magnitude of iron supplementation and its associated factors in anemia hot spot regions of Ethiopia among pregnant women.
methodsThe study was done using the 2019 Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health surveys data. Before any statistical analysis was done, the data were weighted using sampling weight for probability sampling and non-response. Then, a total weighted sample of 2116 reproductive age group women in anemia hot spot regions of Ethiopia were used for this study. A multilevel binary logistic regression model based on the Bayesian approach was fitted using the Brms R package to identify the determinants of iron supplementation in anemia hotspot regions of Ethiopia. Finally, the 95% credible interval (CrI) of the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was used to assess statistical significance. If the interval includes 1, the result is considered non-significant.
resultsThis study showed that in anemia hotspot regions of Ethiopia, the overall magnitude of iron supplementation among pregnant women is 55.5% (95% CrI: 53.4%- 57.6%). Being rural resident (AOR = 0.57; 95% CrI 0.34-0.93), having higher education level (AOR = 3.2; 95% CrI 1.80-5.7), having secondary education level (AOR = 3.28; 95% CrI 2.13-5.1), being wealthy (AOR = 1.80; 95% CrI 1.27-2.54), being household headed by female (AOR = 0.55; 95% CrI 0.43-0.71) and, have no children (AOR = 0.4;95%CrI 0.17-0.98) were significantly associated with iron supplementation among pregnant women in anemia hotspot regions of Ethiopia.
conclusionThe overall magnitude of iron supplementation among pregnant women in anemia hotspot regions of Ethiopia is notably low when compared to the World Health Organization's recommended target. Significant factors associated with higher iron supplementation included having secondary or higher education, rich in wealth, and being from a male-headed household. Conversely, being a rural resident, female-headed household, and having no children were associated with lower iron supplementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.