Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485570›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

The infection post flexible UreteroreNoscopy (I-FUN) predictive model based on machine learning: a new clinical tool to assess the risk of sepsis post retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone disease.

Daniele Castellani, Virgilio De Stefano, Carlo Brocca, Giorgio Mazzon, Antonio Celia, Andrea Bosio, Claudia Gozzo, Eugenio Alessandria, Luigi Cormio, Runeel Ratnayake and 27 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, Ancona, 60126, Italy. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.
Virgilio De StefanoUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, Ancona, 60126, Italy.
Carlo BroccaUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, Ancona, 60126, Italy.
Giorgio MazzonUrology Unit, ULSS 7 Pedemontana, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy.
Antonio CeliaUrology Unit, ULSS 7 Pedemontana, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy.
Andrea BosioDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Claudia GozzoDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Eugenio AlessandriaDepartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Molinette University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Luigi CormioAndrology and Urology Unit, L. Bonomo Hospital, Andria, Italy.
Runeel RatnayakeAndrology and Urology Unit, L. Bonomo Hospital, Andria, Italy.
Andrea Vismara FuginiUrology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Tonino MorenaUrology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tarik Emre SenerDepartment of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Simon ChoongInstitute of Urology, University College Hospitals of London, London, UK.
Stefania FerrettiDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Andrea PescumaDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Salvatore MicaliDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Nicola PavanUrology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alchiede SimonatoUrology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Roberto MianoUrology Unit, AOU Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Luca OrecchiaUrology Unit, AOU Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo Maria PirolaUrology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
Angelo NaselliUrology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert (IUNA), Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro Hernandez-PeñalverDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert (IUNA), Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Michele Di DioDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
Claudio BisegnaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy.
Davide CampobassoUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Emanuele SerafinDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Alessandro AntonelliDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Emanuele RubilottaDepartment of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Deepak RagooriDepartment Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Emanuele BalloniDepartment of Information Engineering, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marina PaolantiDepartment of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, Ancona, 60126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create a machine-learning model for estimating the likelihood of post-retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) sepsis.

methodsAll consecutive patients with kidney stone(s) only undergoing RIRS in 16 centers were prospectively included (January 2022-August 2023). INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult, renal stone(s) only, CT scan (within three months), mid-stream urine culture (within 10 days). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: concomitant ureteral stone, bilateral procedures. In case of symptomatic infection/asymptomatic bacteriuria, patients were given six days of antibiotics according to susceptibility profiles. All patients had antibiotics prophylaxis. Variables selected for the model: age, gender, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stone volume, indwelling preoperative bladder catheter, urine culture, single/multiple stones, indwelling preoperative stent/nephrostomy, ureteric access sheath, surgical time. Analysis was conducted using Python programming language, with Pandas library and machine learning models implemented using the Scikit-learn library. Machine learning algorithms tested: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting. Overall performance was accurately estimated by K-Fold cross-validation with three folds.

results1552 patients were included. There were 20 (1.3%) sepsis cases, 16 (1.0%) septic shock cases, and three more cases (0.2%) of sepsis-related deaths. Random Forest model showed the best performance (precision = 1.00; recall = 0.86; F1 score = 0.92; accuracy = 0.92). A web-based interface of the predictive model was built and is available at https://emabal.pythonanywhere.com/

conclusionsOur model can predict post-RIRS sepsis with high accuracy and might facilitate patient selection for day-surgery procedures and identify patients at higher risk of sepsis who deserve extreme attention for prompt identification and treatment.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiMachine LearningSepsisUreteroscopyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentUreteroscopesComplicationsFlexible ureteroscopyKidney stonesMachine learningRetrograde intrarenal surgerySepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.